Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
1–10 of 244 posts
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#2Direct link to the PDF report:
https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelima...
> "Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects given that a majority of UAP were registered across multiple sensors, to include radar, infrared, electro-optical, weapon seekers, and visual observation."
> "Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings."
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#3> In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings.
Does this mean the objects emit RF energy of some sort?
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#4Are there any plausible theories why this stuff is getting released right now?
It looks like there is no immediate reason for action. And no real reason why they wouldn't have gone on for another decade denying it.
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#5Lol, looks like DNI.gov wasn't ready for the traffic. I'd have thought that all the .gov sites were pretty robust, just as a matter of principle.
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#6Are there any plausible theories why this stuff is getting released right now? It looks like there is no immediate reason for action. And no real reason why they wouldn't have gone on for another decade denying it.
They had to release it.
>The report prepared by the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) was required by the Intelligence Authorization Act passed by Congress late last year. The U.S. intelligence community was given 180 days to prepare an unclassified and classified report on what the U.S. government knew about UAPs.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/highly-anticipated-ufo-repor...
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#7> Some UAP observations could be attributable to developments and classified programs by U.S. entities. We were unable to confirm, however, that these systems accounted for any of the UAP reports we collected.
Seems like a convenient place to hide some cool planes.
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#8Are there any plausible theories why this stuff is getting released right now? It looks like there is no immediate reason for action. And no real reason why they wouldn't have gone on for another decade denying it.
Our government expects visitors soon and this was a step towards preparing the public to what is about to come? xD
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#9Nothing too crazy here. Exactly as expected.
Re: Preliminary Assessment: Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
#10Are there any plausible theories why this stuff is getting released right now? It looks like there is no immediate reason for action. And no real reason why they wouldn't have gone on for another decade denying it.
The Senate ordered DNI to write a public report last year.