Looks like LKML purged all mail of June 18?
“Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
11–20 of 277 posts
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#12Without more context I bet this thread is going to go off-topic.
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#13Looks like LKML purged all mail of June 18?
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#14Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#15I see that these "cleanup" patches are not bringing much value, bust I also don't see why fixing spelling mistakes or log messages is considered as harmful, KPI boosting or not. The maintainer even said if someone else sent those patches it would be OK, but not if Huawei employees do it. If they distrust Huawei so much, why not just ban them from committing, the same way they did recently with university "security re…
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#16Without any context it looks like someone overreacted. It's essentially saying anybody else than Huawei sending cleanup patches is welcome but Huawei is not. Then they try to backtrack that statement by putting out a long list of things which aren't comparable in complexity to the original topic. Without more context I bet this thread is going to go off-topic.
- trivial patches are ok, if you are just doing it for practice. Like a student.
- trivial patches are not ok, if you are doing a lot of them and only for the purpose to get a higher contribution ranking (like commits per company)
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#17I see that these "cleanup" patches are not bringing much value, bust I also don't see why fixing spelling mistakes or log messages is considered as harmful, KPI boosting or not. The maintainer even said if someone else sent those patches it would be OK, but not if Huawei employees do it. If they distrust Huawei so much, why not just ban them from committing, the same way they did recently with university "security re…
Please at least merge all those small fixes into a larger patchset, and with a good cover letter to explain the reason (and auto-tool to do the change if possible) for all the involved maintainers, so that all of us are on the same page.
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#18Without any context it looks like someone overreacted. It's essentially saying anybody else than Huawei sending cleanup patches is welcome but Huawei is not. Then they try to backtrack that statement by putting out a long list of things which aren't comparable in complexity to the original topic. Without more context I bet this thread is going to go off-topic.
There's no professional reason to take such an unrelated jab so it feels more like this individual just found an opportunity to settle a score, or has a different problem with Huawei that's harder to support publicly.
Re: “Please don't waste maintainers' time on your KPI grabbing patches”
#19Actually, with this email and the viral on HN, I think this quotation is true for Qu Wenruo. He/she has just damaged the already broken reputation.
Not only Huawei, but also other companies will take a look at this accident to get the learned lessons.