Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Windows 11

blogs.windows.com

231–240 of 391 posts

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#231
post #22

> The web was born and grew up on Windows I think CERN engineers while working on web and www protocol were using unix as windows was not even there yet. https://home.cern/science/computing/birth-web

Let's not forget https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbird_(online_platform). Bill Gates was actively trying to kill the internet in 1995.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since you're running Ryzen, you can enable firmware-based TPM in your UEFI settings and you should be good to go. Screenshot of the security processor page: https://i.imgur.com/ZWtq8EO.png Screenshot of the PC health check: https://i.imgur.com/Rb3eZIc.png

I'll have to check. I know that my Asus Prime X470 Pro lists TPM as "sold separately"; there's a connector on the motherboard, but the module itself is likely not present. (For example: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1237446-REG/asus_tpm_... )

From the manual[1], it is an option under section 3.6.1 AMD fTPM Configuration. It's built into the CPU rather than the motherboard, but the motherboard can provide a separate hardware TPM.

[1]: https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/SocketAM4/PRIME_X470-P...

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#233

Everyone jokes about it finally being "the year of the linux desktop", but a few years ago that actually did happen to my circle. Between a mac for work and linux at home, I actually haven't touched windows in a number of years at this point, and interestingly, neither have a reasonable number of the technical people I interact with. Of the nontechnical people around me, many of them have transitioned to primarily us…

From wikipedia: " Microsoft Windows is the most commonly installed OS, at approximately between 74% (based on web use) and 97.03% (based on use for gaming) globally"

Presumably you're citing percentage of desktop usage, because about half of the web is viewed on mobile. I know many people who primarily use phones or tablets, with very occasional if any laptop access.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#234

My Primary concern with Windows 11 can be described as follows: 98 - ME XP - Vista 7 - 8 10 - 11 Has Microsoft broken the cycle? Time will tell.

Well, some would argue 8.1 was the rising edge of the cycle and 10 was the falling edge...

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll have to check. I know that my Asus Prime X470 Pro lists TPM as "sold separately"; there's a connector on the motherboard, but the module itself is likely not present. (For example: https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1237446-REG/asus_tpm_... )

From the manual[1], it is an option under section 3.6.1 AMD fTPM Configuration. It's built into the CPU rather than the motherboard, but the motherboard can provide a separate hardware TPM. [1]: https://dlcdnets.asus.com/pub/ASUS/mb/SocketAM4/PRIME_X470-P...

Ha I was in that PDF a few minutes ago. I saw "fTPM" but since it didn't list an explanation, I didn't know if it was an included TPM module or something else.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#236

What about removing all the old crud at some point? All this disorganized layering makes windows feel like a schizophrenic operating system. At some point they have to realize they have to start cleaning up the mess, right?

Why? None of their competitors do.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#237
post #126

My Primary concern with Windows 11 can be described as follows: 98 - ME XP - Vista 7 - 8 10 - 11 Has Microsoft broken the cycle? Time will tell.

Honestly, I find this to be a lazy trope. MS has certainly laid some eggs before, but the "every other version sucks" narrative relies a lot on revisionist thinking. Vista was a resource hog on the hardware of the time, but the UI was honestly a huge improvement and a lot of the complaining about Vista centered around security improvements the _ABSOLUTELY_ needed to happen. I suspect plenty of HN readers have memorie…

7 was a success, but mostly it was "Vista with the rough edges ironed out and more time for hardware to catch up". Ditto for 8 and 8.1. So I think it's based on a real phenomenon, where Microsoft was basically unintentionally doing the "move fast and break things" of modern software development, minus the fast part.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#238
post #5

All I want is a completely new, Unix like file system. Speed sucks in windows, bringing down my patience.

The primary slowdown factor on Windows is not the filesystem itself but Windows Defender doing its scans. Just disable it and file operations will be a lot faster.

If that was the case, would we not expect NTFS on Linux to be better, or at least competitive with other Linux filesystems?

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#239
post #127

Here's a tool to check if your PC meets the hardware requirements[0]. However, it looks like many modern systems don't have TPM 2.0 enabled in the BIOS, and will come back with "This PC can't run Windows 11" (including mine - Asus Prime X470 Pro with Ryzen 2700X, 32GB RAM, 1.5TB storage, Radeon RX 5600 XT.) [0] https://download.microsoft.com/download/1/d/d/1dd9969b-bc9a-...

Apparently, my 3yo desktop isn't compatible (Gigabyte Z270X Ultra). I really doubt people will upgrade their hardware just to use Windows 11.

That doesn't sound right, search around in the BIOS for "Platform Trust Technology" or "PTT". If it's disabled, change it to enabled.

Re: Introducing Windows 11

#240

I had assumed/hoped that the next version of windows would be built atop Linux.

I can think of no reason for anyone to seriously believe such a thing would happen. Most of Windows's value comes from its backwards compatibility, and they'd have to rebuild most of the userspace on top of Linux which doesn't make much sense since they already have a good kernel that they own completely.
Post reply on HN