The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
11–20 of 82 posts
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#12An off-topic question: > When a client Googles your name, who is she more likely to seek out? > she Can someone elaborate the benefits/goals of using the feminine pronoun here? If "he" isn't (for some reason) acceptable as a gender-neutral pronoun, wouldn't "they" be a better fit? I fail to see how gender flipping is a step towards reduction of sexism if that's the goal.
Everything does not need to be made part of culture wars. Why would using she be any different than he? It's like Alice and Bob of oh so many quantum thought experiments but without Bob. If there is only one protagonist you have to go 50/50.
"Everything does not need"
But in my head it sounds better as
"Not everything needs"
Is the latter not acceptable English? Or is it something regional? In my language, it is customary to negate individual nouns, but some English speakers seem to only ever negate the verb.
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#13An off-topic question: > When a client Googles your name, who is she more likely to seek out? > she Can someone elaborate the benefits/goals of using the feminine pronoun here? If "he" isn't (for some reason) acceptable as a gender-neutral pronoun, wouldn't "they" be a better fit? I fail to see how gender flipping is a step towards reduction of sexism if that's the goal.
"Back in the day", some of us used to deliberately alternate pronouns for these sorts of hypothetical people. The idea was to help nudge people toward perceiving "gender-atypical" occupations/situations/etc. as normal: "The programmer opens her text editor...". Since then the world has changed quite rapidly when it comes to norms around writing, pronouns, and gender, so perhaps "they" fills the same role for younger…
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#14Why does medium break text selection?
Maybe the selection disappears on Firefox because their custom context-menu is rendered on top of the selection, thereby "obstructing" the selection by a few pixels?
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#15Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everything does not need to be made part of culture wars. Why would using she be any different than he? It's like Alice and Bob of oh so many quantum thought experiments but without Bob. If there is only one protagonist you have to go 50/50.
Off topic question for you: I'm an ESL speaker and I notice a trend where some people phrase it like "Everything does not need" But in my head it sounds better as "Not everything needs" Is the latter not acceptable English? Or is it something regional? In my language, it is customary to negate individual nouns, but some English speakers seem to only ever negate the verb.
The former example seems characteristic of non-native speech, but is completely understandable also.
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Everything does not need to be made part of culture wars. Why would using she be any different than he? It's like Alice and Bob of oh so many quantum thought experiments but without Bob. If there is only one protagonist you have to go 50/50.
Off topic question for you: I'm an ESL speaker and I notice a trend where some people phrase it like "Everything does not need" But in my head it sounds better as "Not everything needs" Is the latter not acceptable English? Or is it something regional? In my language, it is customary to negate individual nouns, but some English speakers seem to only ever negate the verb.
Re: The Prosperous Software Consultant (2018)
#18An off-topic question: > When a client Googles your name, who is she more likely to seek out? > she Can someone elaborate the benefits/goals of using the feminine pronoun here? If "he" isn't (for some reason) acceptable as a gender-neutral pronoun, wouldn't "they" be a better fit? I fail to see how gender flipping is a step towards reduction of sexism if that's the goal.
Why do you think it's supposed to be a "step towards reduction of sexism"?