The restriction may have made sense during a pandemic, but long term this really seems like something for markets, rather than governments, to solve
San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
21–30 of 84 posts
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#22Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#23The restriction may have made sense during a pandemic, but long term this really seems like something for markets, rather than governments, to solve
The fact that there are many apps competing for this businesses, but the costs to the restaurants are still so high, seems suspicious to me.
That and Matt Levine's take on it ( https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-05-18/the-un... ) posit the thesis of an entire industry that evolved incorrectly and artifically due to near-zero interest rates and arbitrage.
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#24The restriction may have made sense during a pandemic, but long term this really seems like something for markets, rather than governments, to solve
Not to mention that this just shifts costs to other fees like marketing.
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#25Suppose two meals at a restaurant cost $30 for takeout. Depending on how much you value your time, spending even $20 to have those meals delivered to you might be worth 20 minutes of commuting back and forth. A 67% delivery fee could still be a bargain to you. The government should not interfere.
Meal = $30, Delivery = $20
Customer Pays = $50 Restaurant gets $30 - fees% (e.g. $25.50 at 15%) Delivery company keeps $24.50
I believe this is about capping that fees% at 15%.
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Delivery is expensive and network effects are valuable. Price-fixing is already illegal
Delivery platforms can stay solvent due to capital markets longer than restaurants and drivers they exploit. Regulation is required.
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#27Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#28Do these fees also cover the cost of the deliver driver for the restaurant? Because 15% still seems high, but that might not be a bad deal for the restaurants if it's covering the cost of delivery.
The issue is that the user is charged: (restaurant cost) + (delivery cost) and the restaurant is paid (restaurant cost - 15%) (actually around 25%-30% I think without the cap) So that fee is more like a commission than an actual fee
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#29I don't see how delivery can be profitable on < $10 orders with a 15% cap.
Re: San Francisco permanently caps delivery app fees for restaurants at 15%
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
The fact that there are many apps competing for this businesses, but the costs to the restaurants are still so high, seems suspicious to me.
Delivery is expensive and network effects are valuable. Price-fixing is already illegal