Earlier quoted context omitted.
Olympic weightlifting is already split into relatively thin weight brackets. I think the issue is that, pound for pound, men tend to be stronger than women In the 76-81kg womens bracket current record total (snatch + cnj) is 278kg. In the 73-81kg mens bracket the record total is 363kg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_weightlifting#Weight_c... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_world_records_in_Olymp...
Men have a huge advantage in power and speed over women of the same weight; this is uncontroversial. This is not affected by reducing blood testosterone.
Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
81–90 of 643 posts
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#82I’m curious as to what the biologically female competitors think about this.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's the problem that division into genders is supposed to address. Currently we have n = 2. Results favoring one of the two genders is addressed by having separate categories with separate results: women's records, men's records.
Rather than splitting by gender it should be split by sex, or birth sex, if you prefer.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#84I think sports categories should be chromosome strings. "XX division", "XY world record". "XXY 400 m finals", "XYY long jump trials", ... Gender identity doesn't factor into it at all; the words "man", "woman" should not be used. Problem solved; you don't get to wedge yourself into competition with XX persons if you're XY.
That seems like it introduces more problems than it solves; genetic essentialism as a solution to debates about gender tends to be an approach that nobody agrees with. Now you still have the same concerns about people using hormones, plus: - intersex people whose phenotype and genotype don’t match (putting them in the “wrong” category) - chimeric people who belong in different categories depending on which part of th…
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#85Yup - finally this has reached the point where gender politics crashes into reality. I’m not against any gender doing what they wish. But really, the point is when you (by nature) have testosterone coursing through your bloodstream… even if you transitioned, by the very nature of things you have an advantage of strength, agility, speed and desire over your female peers. As much as we would love to believe it, men are…
This graph made the rounds on Reddit: https://i.redd.it/vv4ws1848t671.jpg One has to completely ignore reality to try to pretend that is a fair competition. One other thing to note from that graph is the worst performance from a man was significantly better than the best performance from cis-woman. Testosterone makes you stronger, who knew?
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps classes on ability necessary to the sport should be the only way to go?
But that is futile, because ability necessary to the sport is what produces the results, i.e. rankings. So that amounts to just (1) everyone competing together as if there were one category, then (2) being ranked from winner to loser, and (3) we then declare that each rank is its own ability class, so everyone is a winner in their ability class! Bob is the winner of the #1 division, Amy is the winner of the #2 divisi…
Then you end up with perverse incentives. The #1 person in the 2nd division doesn't really want to work harder to move up to the 1st division, because they're likely to never get beyond 10th or 9th or so. And the 10th place holder in the 1st division might find it more prestigious to slow down a little to try to take the #1 spot of the 2nd division.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#87I’m curious as to what the biologically female competitors think about this.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#88I think sports categories should be chromosome strings. "XX division", "XY world record". "XXY 400 m finals", "XYY long jump trials", ... Gender identity doesn't factor into it at all; the words "man", "woman" should not be used. Problem solved; you don't get to wedge yourself into competition with XX persons if you're XY.
At what levels would this apply? Would we actually blood test 14 year olds? What about trans men who where assigned female at birth? Are they allowed to take testosterone and still compete against XX women?
> Are they allowed to take testosterone
Absolutely not; however, doped sports could be yet separate category. There is probably audience money in it, like in monster trucks and WWF wrestling.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#89What is the argument in favor of allowing transgenders to compete in female sports? Does anyone actually defend this decision?
Why wouldn't people support transgendered people able to be the gender they wish and being able to do so in all possible aspects? Be they transwomen wanting to play female sports, or transmen wanting to play male sports (which you oddly leave out of your question).
Ok, that is a plausible argument. However, it's missing one major component: How could anyone argue that this is one of the aspects or life where it is actually possible to treat someone as their preferred gender? If I had to cherry pick an example of an aspect of life where it is not possible to treat a transgender person as their preferred gender, it would be Olympic sports.
That's probably precisely why they are doing this. They're obviously trying to make a political statement. They want it to be the inspiring event that puts this Olympics in the history books. But I mean... Come on people, there are obvious reasons why this athlete is not going to be remembered heroically for their political message in the same way as someone like Jesse Owens.
Re: Rival weightlifter speaks out on transgender Hubbard's Olympic place
#90I think sports categories should be chromosome strings. "XX division", "XY world record". "XXY 400 m finals", "XYY long jump trials", ... Gender identity doesn't factor into it at all; the words "man", "woman" should not be used. Problem solved; you don't get to wedge yourself into competition with XX persons if you're XY.
It might be better to have hormone classes in sports the way boxing has weight classes. You could have Mike Tyson class all the way through Betty White class, and as a side benefit you'd be able to put women's sports teams in with appropriately matched men. As another side benefit a lot of people who were simply born with the wrong stuff to compete could rise to the top of their class by hard work. Since there's not…