New Kind of Paper
mlajtos.mu
New Kind of Paper
1–10 of 127 posts
Re: New Kind of Paper
#2> it can display graphics such as graphs, plots, diagrams, images or even interactive ball-and-stick model of a chemical compound
> it is programmable, i.e. you can write your own functions with recursion, conditionals and loops
This sounds similar to Ken Perlin's Chalk Talk. See the demo at https://youtu.be/xuzrF_82z7U?t=2679 but the whole video is worth watching.
> RAND Tablet had handwriting recognition that was based on _clever heuristic+, i.e. no machine learning, and it required person to write slightly different than it would normally write with a pen and paper.
The linked page on handwriting recognition is as interesting as this article: https://jackschaedler.github.io/handwriting-recognition/
Re: New Kind of Paper
#3Re: New Kind of Paper
#4Re: New Kind of Paper
#5Aligning the symbols for easy parsing in the "best" example was a nice trick.
Re: New Kind of Paper
#6Re: New Kind of Paper
#7Funny how different people still act equally as blown-away by technology that's been around for decades, but I guess that's retrofuturism raison d'etre.
Re: New Kind of Paper
#8I've been disappointed at how limited the pen input is on the iPad. Few apps support it and its built-in understanding of text has a very simplistic model.
Re: New Kind of Paper
#9Aligning the symbols for easy parsing in the "best" example was a nice trick.
When I watched the video in the post where it converted the written text to characters, my immediate thought was that I wished those characters lined up with what you wrote because it's jarring to just see them rearrange far from where you wrote them out. I was happy to see the later example with the boxes.
Re: New Kind of Paper
#10Also, having all of the input terms be integers, yet the answer returned as a floating point, seems a basic type error.
In general, though, it seems to miss the mark. If you’re going with a hybrid electronic/pen approach, why not let the computer handle the annoying bits, like having to wrap things in parentheses that you manually need to keep balanced? Why not draw a circle around some terms, and have that get used for grouping? Why not have the entry itself be interactive, like in the works of Bret Victor?