Live data from Hacker News

Alpha-Gal Syndrome

mayoclinic.org

41–50 of 155 posts

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#41

Why don’t we make ticks extinct?

Well, while I am fine with trying to make some infectious diseases to become extinct, I would be careful here, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_campaign. In any case, apparently somebody else wondered about that too: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/wkyax/if_we_cou...

However, it's conceivable that in the future we will figure out how to carry out large-scale vaccinations of tics, so we eradicate certain diseases from them before they are transmitted to humans.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#42

Why don’t we make ticks extinct?

That's a good question. Here in Latvia they actually make any walk in long grass somewhat problematic, as well as letting animals like dogs inside for whatever reason.

I actually got lyme disease a few years ago - had a period of pretty lethargic behaviour and noticeable joint pain. Blood work helped figure out its presence in my body and a course of antibiotics thankfully made me better.

Now, i'm not precisely sure about the long term symptoms, since me having occasional memory problems, insomnia and depression/anxiety all might be unrelated to it, but some people definitely get such symptoms and even worse ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyme_disease#Late_disseminated...

After malaria and mosquitoes have been properly addressed, it would be nice to collectively work on ticks.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#44
post #6

I found this podcast [0] by Radiolab on the topic to be quite the eye opener. (ear opener?) [0] - https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/alpha...

I guess, it made you look differently at a certain aspect(s) of the world. So, I guess, still an "eye opener" despite the medium :)

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#45
post #41

Why don’t we make ticks extinct?

Well, while I am fine with trying to make some infectious diseases to become extinct, I would be careful here, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_campaign . In any case, apparently somebody else wondered about that too: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/wkyax/if_we_cou... However, it's conceivable that in the future we will figure out how to carry out large-scale vaccinations of tics, so we eradi…

Doesn't change anything to be honest. Any parasite should be eradicated regardless of whether it is infectious or not.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#46
post #29

Guess what? It's glycotime again! Gal(ɑ1,3)Gal (Galili epitope) is a common epitope in most animals, but in primates we lost the activity of the gene (GGTA1) to synthesise it. Since we don't produce it any more, it's recognised as foreign by our body and not only causes rejection in xenotransplantation, but also this Alpha-Gal allergy. I'm not going to comment on the actual immune mechanisms that take place with deve…

Also fascinated by the fact that it's possible to lose tolerance to something you've ostensibly recognized as "okay" for most of your life, but I mostly wanted to just say that "problematic pandemic primed populations" got a hearty chuckle out of me.

Well, allergies are almost always "something you tolerated most of your life (until then)" ... in my understanding you're not born with immune-intolerance to something (although you are most certainly born with a disposition or lack thereof), and not always is the manifestation of an allergy your system's first encounter with that specific protein - it is simply chance.

E.g. the possibly most prevalent allergies, against pollen, manifest well after kindergarten, or even in teenagers. Until then the system did not care at all about pollen. The reason must be something entirely unrelated to pollen. And there are more and more cases of people developing pollen allergies well after age 50! (But: often you will find other allergies or "pre-symptoms" in kids, e.g. neurodermatitis or milk-protein allergies).

In fact you always develop the allergy on exposure AFAIK - it just might be the first exposure. But the reason is most often completely unrelated to this specific substance/protein.

There are even several known substances that are known to cause allergies to develop on exposure (with high probability). But what you become allergic to is pure chance, e.g. could be the nickel-plated jewelry on your skin which you never had a problem with until then.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#48
post #41

Why don’t we make ticks extinct?

Well, while I am fine with trying to make some infectious diseases to become extinct, I would be careful here, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_campaign . In any case, apparently somebody else wondered about that too: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/wkyax/if_we_cou... However, it's conceivable that in the future we will figure out how to carry out large-scale vaccinations of tics, so we eradi…

One could kill the ticks that spread human disease while leaving the vast majority that don’t.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#49
post #2

This and Lyme are my main(ly irrational) reasons for never hiking outside of, like, Hawaii. And I'm sure a more seasoned HNer can scare me away from that, too. Any news on whether exposure treatments like those for peanut allergies have any effect on alpha-gal allergies too?

Spending time in the wilderness on the east coast is not worth it anymore.

Re: Alpha-Gal Syndrome

#50
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like it is necessary to be scared of it an amount proportional to how bad it is times the expected chance you get it. And as bad as these are, they're just not likely, and even less likely if you're careful at all.

Agreed- the psychological and physical health benefits attributed by several studies to regular exposure to wooded and rural outdoor spaces is almost certainly worth the risk.

I disagree as someone who spent all my time outside up through age 18 or so.
Post reply on HN