"Fool me once Shame on you. Fool me twice Shame on me." --Chinese Proverb.
The 404 Test: Wildly Brilliant or User Suicide?
41–48 of 48 posts
Re: The 404 Test: Wildly Brilliant or User Suicide?
#42Alternate link - http://dob.posterous.com/the-404-test-wildly-brilliant Apparently the blog.dougpetkanics.com DNS may not have propagated yet. Sorry!
your site is showing 404 error too, Maybe even you are testing to to see how many people will click on the link. ;)
Re: The 404 Test: Wildly Brilliant or User Suicide?
#43Re: The 404 Test: Wildly Brilliant or User Suicide?
#44The author is making the assumption that clicking on the 404 link is correlated with interest in the feature... I'm not sure if that's always the case.
Re: The 404 Test: Wildly Brilliant or User Suicide?
#45A solid idea, but why not spend 5 more minutes, make the link point to a page that says "Sorry, we're still working on [feature X]. Check back soon!" and avoid looking like an amateur? Better yet, include a form on that landing page asking how important the feature would be to the user, and get the best of both worlds.
> make the link point to a page that says "Sorry, we're still working on [feature X]. Check back soon!" and avoid looking like an amateur? You've officially missed the point of the article. The argument is not that you look like an amateur, but that the user thinks the problem is with their computer or ISP. Since most 404's are due to user error in URI entry, web filters or cross-site link rot, this is a reasonable a…