Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
151–160 of 407 posts
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#152It is obvious that we need better legislation to deal with all the new possibilities that technologies have opened. The installation of this app, even done with good intent, open a lot of questions on what should be possible or not to be done by government and corporations. When you get a device with pre-installed, uninstallable, or auto-installed apps. What are the rules? > "By enabling this service, you can be quic…
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#153I think the real question is what mechanism allows them to push a random app to some phones? google play services is actively listening for remote installation requests? that's essentially a remote-code-execution backdoor to all android phones?
My guess is that it's the Play Store app itself that does this (con.android.vending). That app is responsible for both updating itself regularly and installing/updating other apps. One possible way: There is a daily job run in the Play Store called "daily hygiene" that performs various configured tasks based on device state and device targeting. It would not be difficult to add some code to install this app for MA us…
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#154Earlier quoted context omitted.
Read up on how the contact tracing apps work. They do not upload your data to the cloud. Phones broadcast a rolling random identifier, other phones collect received identifiers, and only on confirmed infection does the person's phone upload its last two weeks of broadcast IDs to the cloud, where other phones can grab them and cross-check. Having someone's phone number allows you (via the phone company) to trace their…
Just because protocol is theoretically safe does not imply it is safe in actual practice or that it is not possible to exploit it.
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#155Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#156Most of the comments on that app as well as here are probably wrong. I'd suspect that everyone who had the app "installed without their permission" opted into the Android COVID-19 Exposure Notification program. This was deployed by Google as part of an update to Google Play Services. When you go to your phone's settings with this update, there's an option to enable COVID-19 Exposure Notifications. When you turn it on…
When you opt-in, does it notify you of all the permissions the app will require? - view network connections - pair with Bluetooth devices - full network access - run at startup - prevent device from sleeping
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#157Earlier quoted context omitted.
When you opt-in, does it notify you of all the permissions the app will require? - view network connections - pair with Bluetooth devices - full network access - run at startup - prevent device from sleeping
Virtually every non-trivial Android application has these permissions, none of which are even important enough for the system to prompt you for permission. The only interesting one is "pair with Bluetooth devices" which is how the Exposure Notifications system works.
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#158I think the real question is what mechanism allows them to push a random app to some phones? google play services is actively listening for remote installation requests? that's essentially a remote-code-execution backdoor to all android phones?
A corollary of your question. If Google can lawfully install arbitrary apps on ordinary users' phones, can it also run arbitrary code on the personal devices of government officials investigating it for price fixing in the ad market?
Of the partners in this, I think that the source of authority waa almost certainly the other one. It’s not Google, but the State of Massachusetts, whose authority is likely involved.
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#159Most of the comments on that app as well as here are probably wrong. I'd suspect that everyone who had the app "installed without their permission" opted into the Android COVID-19 Exposure Notification program. This was deployed by Google as part of an update to Google Play Services. When you go to your phone's settings with this update, there's an option to enable COVID-19 Exposure Notifications. When you turn it on…
I have no memory of ever opting into the program you describe, and it isn't the type of thing I would normally do. It's possible I guess.
In any case, the way they did this is creepy. There was no icon for the app; I had to look in Settings/Apps & Notifications to find it. And neither the official state press releases nor the few local news stories about it mention that the app was installed without notice. They use vague, lawyerly language about how it can be "enabled".
Re: Massachusetts health notifications app installed without users’ knowledge
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ToS is the least of it I'm afraid I disagree. Google running code on your phone implies it believes you have consented to that. That consent was not given in the app store, so it must have come from the ToS. Consent is an exception to virtually every protection that exists: Wiretap Act, state wiretapping laws, the CFAA, and state computer trespass laws. Remember, consent is the difference between a home invasion an…
If you've got a stock Android device you've obviously consented to Google running some code, and even updating to add new code after you bought it. On the other hand, apps are restricted based on permissions, and Google bypassing that would belie a consent theory. You're making out like code is code and there aren't already existing lines and stopping principles, which just isn't true on its face.