Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is no alternative on ios. I choose not to watch videos on mobile over using android.
I'm using Brave on iOS as we speak...
Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
311–320 of 329 posts
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#312Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm no fan of him and i'm not knowledgeable, but from a quick search the only thing antisemitic i could see from him was using on stage a pig with a david star and a dollar sign (sigh). Not that it's ok at all, but is he known for other antisemitic displays/rhetoric? Or is fighting against Israel's apartheid and denouncing that politicians are sold to billionaires now antisemitic? I'm really not OK with the "jews = m…
Fortunately, the claim the Israel is an apartheid state appears to be false, according to those who lived through apartheid. [1] [2] [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcEL-NlxBk0 [2]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocNttZV4G_0
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#313Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also works as opposed to donating to individual Patreons and such. I still don't like a cut being taken by YT because I disagree with their business practices though. Sponsorships are the future of online media creation, I guess. The YT ads are obviously dealt with through an adblocker.
Aha disagree with business practices, but happy to use their infrastructure to consume content, and still complaining about watching ads - ok
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#314Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm using Brave on iOS as we speak...
Brave on iOS is just a wrapper over Safari's WebKit and JavaScript runtime. Apple bans all competing rendering and JavaScript implementations from the App Store, forcing browser developers to develop skins over Safari.
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#315Earlier quoted context omitted.
Part of what problem exactly? Do you think modern society would even exist without economic growth being the main driving factor? The idea that people would just sit around creating things for altruistic reasons is a utopian pipe dream. Constantly seeking material growth isn't perfect but it provides more positive aspects than negative ones.
One of the problems is ecological destruction which has increased with economic growth. I would argue that because growth is so unevenly captured by those at the top, a very high gini coefficient is another problem.
The halcyon past never existed. If we want things to get better we need to move more complex not simplified for the sake of aesthetics and sparing ourselves from having to use our thinkmeats.
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#316Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see how that's related to 'general computing'. Microsoft does not have a monopoly on the distribution of software.
That's exactly my point. They didn't in the past, but modern OS vendors do.
And that is just native apps. You can publish whatever app or game you want on your website, and the server for that site can be a simple Raspberry Pi in your home.
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#317Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the problems is ecological destruction which has increased with economic growth. I would argue that because growth is so unevenly captured by those at the top, a very high gini coefficient is another problem.
You mean how clean things were in the industrial revolution? And how eglatarian it was under feudalism? Or back when slash and burn was the only agriculture? Back when we were causing mass extinctions with pointy sticks and still having a population in danger of extinction? The halcyon past never existed. If we want things to get better we need to move more complex not simplified for the sake of aesthetics and sparin…
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#318Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's exactly my point. They didn't in the past, but modern OS vendors do.
How so? Google only reviews apps published on their store. You can upload an APK anywhere, for anyone to download and use on their own device. iOS is obviously more locked down, but globally, Android has greater market share. And that is just native apps. You can publish whatever app or game you want on your website, and the server for that site can be a simple Raspberry Pi in your home.
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#319Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you're suggesting that we eschew all the modern conveniences we have that help us live longer healthier lives to stop climate change? Do me a favor and look up the average live span before the advent of electricity. Stop presenting a false dilemma by pretending all we've gotten out of our progress is iphones and cat videos. I think you know that's not true at all.
It's not a zero sum game. We can live perfectly comfortable moved without a lot of the stuff have, or doing things slightly differently. Some things we as consumers wouldn't even really notice, like better insulation standards.
You're right and that's why I specifically said it's a net gain and not that there were no negative aspects to it. Constant economic growth pushes innovation, yes there are downsides just as there are with anything.
Re: Researchers fear a scenario in which smart speakers feed sleepers subliminal ads
#320Earlier quoted context omitted.
We've reversed a lot of that destruction in the past century. You're benefiting daily from that growth and your modern lifestyle (in 1st world countries) is far above what people enjoyed even half a century ago. Unfortunately destruction is a necessary evil. There's no way to improve society while simultaneously avoiding any ecological change. Unless you're suggesting we all go back to some sort of nomadic lifestyle?
Not absolutely, but it can be a hell of a lot better than it is. We don't, for example need to have such a lot of disposable packaging, we don't need to farm the way we do etc
Ok, innovate a way to ship items across the world while keeping them from spoiling, getting damaged and make it so they're received in a timely manner. I'd also like to see how you can feed an entire planet with 1st world standards and not farm the way we do.
Just a hunch but my guess is you'll be no where near as efficient or viable as you think you would. I'm gonna place my trust in experts and not arm-chair internet activists.
The only reason you're even able to sit around and consider things like this IS because we've innovated to the point that your base needs are met without you having to lift a finger.
So, yes we should always strive to be better but you also need to take a few moments and realize the sort of advancements it took to put you in a position to consider issues like packaging/factory farming instead of where you're going to get your next meal or drink of water.