Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
scientificamerican.com
Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
1–10 of 102 posts
Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#2Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#3The picture at the top is an IR plume from a jet. Guess that doesn't make a very good article. Why would this article be in a "science" magazine?
The article doesn't say that. How can you be so sure from a still image?
Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#4The picture at the top is an IR plume from a jet. Guess that doesn't make a very good article. Why would this article be in a "science" magazine?
> The picture at the top is an IR plume from a jet The article doesn't say that. How can you be so sure from a still image?
Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#5Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#6It is also mathematically silly to assume that of all possible beings over current universe timeline that we are the most technically advanced. We have only existed for a minuscule sliver of that timespan.
That’s not to say that we are statistically likely to have been visited, however. But it is possible.
Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#70: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/29505/the-navys-secret...
Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#8Re: Experts Weigh in on Pentagon UFO Report
#9I am prone to think that this again some kind of gov mass psychology Rorschach experiment, where they say if we show you this image and if we say it is flying bunny how many times do we need to show and repeat the same until you start believing it is a flying bunny ...
By the way I am not saying other sentient being do not exist in the universe, I am just saying that with that technology you would not give a fork about what humans want/need/wish ... therefore it is more likely it is some kind of political hocus/pocus