I didn’t read the entire spec, maybe there’s stuff that replaced cookies in there.
New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
11–20 of 269 posts
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#12I don't see how this will be adopted without backing by legal threats. Even if this gets implemented on a voluntary basis, you need a fallback for browsers that don't support it. And if you need to have a version of the prompt with a user experience that isn't controlled by the browser, you might just as well use it to keep pushing the same dark patterns to everyone. Am I missing something?
I agree. Why would anyone who wants to track users implement this standard and abandon their dark patterns?
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#13There already is the do-not-track flag, why not just force everybody to respect it?
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#14Reminder that we've already had a spec for it. In the 90s! And it even has been implemented in the Internet Explorer: https://www.w3.org/P3P/ It did absolutely nothing for privacy. Google has been sending bogus P3P headers that broke IE's implementation and allowed all cookies. Adtech companies don't want users to have an easy opt-out. They didn't want P3P. They didn't want DNT. They will not want this new spec, unle…
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#15Reminder that we've already had a spec for it. In the 90s! And it even has been implemented in the Internet Explorer: https://www.w3.org/P3P/ It did absolutely nothing for privacy. Google has been sending bogus P3P headers that broke IE's implementation and allowed all cookies. Adtech companies don't want users to have an easy opt-out. They didn't want P3P. They didn't want DNT. They will not want this new spec, unle…
Unless regulators force companies to respect automated protocols.
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#16If it's opt-in, hidden inside browsers settings, effectively no-one will use it (e.g. current cookie blocking settings).
If it's opt-out everyone will use it (see e.g. Apple's recent "This app is asking to track you across the internet, do you want to allow it?".
Question is, why make it complicated with a spec like this. Better to just agree to block all cookies, or to allow cookies.
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#17Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#18Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#19Reminder that we've already had a spec for it. In the 90s! And it even has been implemented in the Internet Explorer: https://www.w3.org/P3P/ It did absolutely nothing for privacy. Google has been sending bogus P3P headers that broke IE's implementation and allowed all cookies. Adtech companies don't want users to have an easy opt-out. They didn't want P3P. They didn't want DNT. They will not want this new spec, unle…
That won't stop them from additionally using cookie banners, out of spite. But I suspect many websites that currently have cookie banners only have them because they believe it to be necessary, and it's hard to push back on it. If such a spec came to be recognized as a way to obtain consent by regulation, it'd make it easy to point its way, and at least end the madness of cookie banners on websites that don't need it.
Re: New browser signal could make cookie banners obsolete
#20Cookies are used for things other than tracking, so maybe not obsolete, just irrelevant for tracking usage. I didn’t read the entire spec, maybe there’s stuff that replaced cookies in there.