GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
1–10 of 411 posts
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#2This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell.
Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#3This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell. Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
[deleted]
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#4Kudos for writing something in rust and not appending "written in rust!" everywhere.
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#5Kudos for writing something in rust and not appending "written in rust!" everywhere.
It's the new "I use Arch btw". Genuinely kind of tired of it already.
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#6Kudos for writing something in rust and not appending "written in rust!" everywhere.
Thanks for letting us know :)
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#7This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell. Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
A lot of people just upvote anything that is a GitHub repo because it's generally more useful than actual news
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#8This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell. Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
It's not uncommon for people to upvote without commenting if they don't have anything to actually add or the post is self-explanatory
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#9This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell. Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
This tracker was a show HN last month, looks pretty normal https://upvotetracker.com/post/hn/27525031
Re: GitHub – nushell/nushell: A new type of shell
#10This looks pretty awesome. Wonder if it could be used with a command rather than as a new shell. Tangent: How is this at the top of the front page with a dozen upvotes and no comments? Maybe these upvotes all occurred at once?
On one hand I do like the idea that it's a shell since it means in it's nicely integrated with itself (can't think of a better phrase), but on the other hand it's also what's making me a bit reluctant to seriously consider it because I'm too used to fish.
It would be ideal to me if it were a tool that could be piped into.
However, that's not to say I won't at least give it a try these days, since I'm really curious about it.