Mozilla needs to do something to de-dramatize what some people see as version inflation. A lot of people get anxious to see these very frequent bumps because major x releases are associated with add-ons not working, bloat, etc.
True, but on the other hand people will get used to it, just like they did with Chrome. The version number doesn't matter, all that matters is that it works. I like to see Mozilla responding. I don't know if development has speeded up, but it seems to have done. If they can keep this up without letting security slip I'll be impressed.
Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
41–50 of 124 posts
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#42Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#43So then Firefox will still be behind Chrome? Firefox 7 will be the one launched in the same time with Chrome 14. Chrome 14 should be stable in about 8-10 weeks. Firefox 8 won't be stable until 14-16 weeks from now. That's around the time Chrome 15 will be out.
The release number should just be the date. That way geeks can stop worrying about the number, and get back to work.
"Oh, you're using IE from August 27, 2001? That's a little bit out of date. Because browsers update so fast, we can only support browsers released within the last 2 years." :-)
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#44I was expecting a parody of version number inflation, but it seems to be a real article. So FF really jumps to version 8?
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you seriously going to over-analyze specific tenses of words? Each major version will include different features. Stop just trying to distract the conversation.
The "conversation" of this thread started with someone commenting on the fact, seemingly surprised and even bothered, that we are already talking about Firefox 8 when seemingly Firefox 6 and 7 went by so quickly we didn't notice it happening. In this context, it is incredibly relevant that Firefox 6 and 7 are still being described in the future tense, as that would imply that they haven't actually been released yet.
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#46Firefox 8? What happened to 6 and 7? I see 7's mentioned in the article, but there's not hide nor hair of Firefox 6.
FF6 is in beta, should be out by the end of summer (or early autumn), FF7 is in alpha and should be released before end-of-year. I guess FF8 (which just arrived on the nightly channel) will be up for release in late 2011-early 2012.
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#47Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#48You couldn't have a better demonstration of why competition is good. I stick with FF because I prefer the interface, but there's no question that all web browsers have become much better since Chrome's introduction. And if you're willing to drop support for IE6, web development is really a pleasure compared to five years ago.
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
True, but on the other hand people will get used to it, just like they did with Chrome. The version number doesn't matter, all that matters is that it works. I like to see Mozilla responding. I don't know if development has speeded up, but it seems to have done. If they can keep this up without letting security slip I'll be impressed.
Chrome users in general do not use as many extensions as Firefox users, so they have less reason to worry about them breaking.
Re: Firefox 8 is 20% faster than Firefox 5, matches Chrome 14
#50What about type rendering? If FF on OSX no longer uses quartz to perform drawing operations, what implications are there for type rendering? Will OSX users be subjected to the (IMO) ravages of freetype? Or will each platform continue to use native type rasterization?