Thanks YouTube for liberating us from having opinions. Imagine how dangerous that could be!
“YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
51–60 of 329 posts
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#52Based on YouTube’s reply, seems they took his video down for promoting dangerous medical misinformation. If that’s what happened, I don’t see an issue.
Do Google/Alphabet/YouTube have an on-staff biology team who are actively publishing in the field to counter his information? Or are they doing take downs at the request of anonymous dissenters?
It is always strange the dichotomy of views here. Since COVID it seems to be trending towards "Question everything, except the current dogma".
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Garbage In Garbage Out Open-Label studies on some poor country are not "quality evidence". (On the other hand I don't take that manufacturer's statement as a fair and honest assessment of the drug) We do need serious studies on the repurposing of drugs, but people take it as their silver bullet.
No one is paying for studies where there is no money to be made later. It's a chicken and egg problem in a way. Ivermectin is cheap and off patent.
> No one is paying for studies where there is no money to be made later
A number of public and philanthropic groups write grants. I’ve written grants. And just because a commercial interest funds a study doesn’t mean it’s B.S.
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#54What else should scientists do than challenging the status quo? Bret (Eric's brother, biology PhD) had a 2h long conversation with Pierre Kory (MD) and it was taken down by YT. One of the things they talked was the recommendations of WHO and other organisations to focus on supportive care only (supporting the patient while their organism fights the disease by itself). They insist on not using other treatments outside…
> They insist on not using other treatments outside clinical trials. The argument that running experiments would cost lives doesn't seem coherent. Clinical trials are structured experiments which follow a certain protocol, ethical review, etc... > It's not like we have this 100+ yrs practice of dealing with SARS-CoV-2 epidemic with well established protocols We do have 100+ years of practice in dealing with various d…
Yes. Ethical review boards, patient confidentiality, and modern clinical studies did not exist during any other pandemic comparable with SARS-CoV-2. Like in wartime, when the threat is to society as a whole not just individuals, individual rights take a back seat.
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#55Eric Weinstein is a clown, like, literally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Weinstein#Physics
You mean figuratively, not literally.
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#56Eric Weinstein is a clown, like, literally. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Weinstein#Physics
Unless you show me a picture of him dressed in a clown suit, no he is not literally a clown.
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#57Does anyone know what exactly was said in the original video?
The entire conversation has been uploaded to Bitchute
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#58The makers of Ivermectin are against the use of Ivermectin for Covid. https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use... The dissenters are advocating things even the company that stands to profit from those things opposes. That’s how off the deep end this is.
This is all about making money...including the covid vaccine. Covid is even more of a goldmine because they locked in special liability protections.
Big money has a decent amount of influence over what information is accessible to the general public. We're witnessing the modern version of burning books...but many are too WOKE to realize.
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#59The makers of Ivermectin are against the use of Ivermectin for Covid. https://www.merck.com/news/merck-statement-on-ivermectin-use... The dissenters are advocating things even the company that stands to profit from those things opposes. That’s how off the deep end this is.
The company has another upcoming drug they want to push rather than ivermectin: https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein/status/1402647948371005441 E: To add, I'm not a doctor but Brett Weinstein seems adamant that ivermectin is a very safe drug for humans. One point he has made is that because ivermectin is safe for consumption, there's no (Or very little) downside to taking it in an attempt to prevent or help with COVID.
So you are asserting they don't want to benefit from both?
Re: “YouTube is shutting down dissenting Biology PhDs and MDs”
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
> insist on not using other treatments outside clinical trials That signals they may have conflict of interest. For example accidentally finding a treatment that works, could mean huge loss for vaccine business. (Just to be clear, I am not anti-vax. I got vaccinated myself and I believe there is no better option right now, however, trying to limit doctors in finding other means sounds extremely fishy)
Telling doctors to not randomly experiment on their patients outside of a controlled studies seems perfectly reasonable. Most medical groups tend to view uncontrolled human experimentation as very unethical and have for a long time.
Thanks god doctors don't wait to have a random double blind experiment peer reviewed and published to act. I understand the practice of putting ICU patients on ventilators was found to be more harmful and following word of mouth, ICU specialists switched to less invasive care. Was that unethical?