Live data from Hacker News

Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

news.virginia.edu

21–30 of 217 posts

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#21

This reminds me of a clip of Louis CK talking about losing the ability to just sit with your own thoughts and be really sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbYScltf1c&t=53s Shame he turned out to be a sexual deviant because he said some interesting things.

I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss his entire act because of what he did. Watch his latest special to see his perspective. He’s not exactly Bill Cosby.

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#23
post #12
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes but at least they are consistent with the pattern word of numeral , which is often a good rule to use if not employing a specific styleguide. For example, using the APA guide[1] for numbers (thanks @OJFord for pointing out my error): “Six to 15”, “12 of 18”, Six of 24”. Edit: As @temp8964 correctly pointed out, there are situations where words are recommended[2]. – [1]: https://apastyle.apa.org/ [2]: https://apas…

Don't you have that backwards? I'm not familiar with APA style guide but I was taught at school (UK) to use words below ten (at least, and to be consistent, i.e. saying 'ten' just then is fine as long as I don't now start saying '10' or '11') - I'd be surprised if APA advocated exactly the opposite, based on your example.

Hah! You're right, of course. My mind must have been elsewhere when writing the example, considering that I was literally reading the APA guide and thinking of the rule you laid out while at it.

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#24
Ever since reading Bertrand Russell's "The Conquest of Happiness", I've thought a lot about the importance of being able to sit inside my own head. One quote that I wrote down:

> A life too full of excitement is an exhausting life, in which continually stronger stimuli are needed to give the thrill that has come to be thought an essential part of pleasure. A person accustomed to too much excitement is like a person with a morbid craving for pepper, who comes at last to be unable even to taste a quantity of pepper which would cause anyone else to choke. There is an element of boredom which is inseparable from the avoidance of too much excitement, and too much excitement not only undermines the health, but dulls the palate for every kind of pleasure, substituting titillations for profound organic satisfactions, cleverness for wisdom, and jagged surprises for beauty... A certain power of enduring boredom is therefore essential to a happy life, and is one of the things that ought to be taught to the young.

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#25
The principal author of this paper, Timothy D. Wilson has done some awesome research. I can highly recommend his book Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. I found it it be very illuminating and even useful for understanding others and myself better.

https://www.amazon.com/Strangers-to-Ourselves-audiobook/dp/B...

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#26

This reminds me of a clip of Louis CK talking about losing the ability to just sit with your own thoughts and be really sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HbYScltf1c&t=53s Shame he turned out to be a sexual deviant because he said some interesting things.

Two sides of a coin. "Deviant" and "interesting" are the same kinds behaviors but with different value judgements.

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"One bad thought ruins entirety of humans other thoughts, they are now null and void. News at eleven!"

What’s that quote from?

Poor use of sarcasm (as most sarcasm is).

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#28
Our society isn't exactly set up for "doing nothing", either. If you're just sitting somewhere without doing anything, you might be loitering, you'll start getting funny looks if this goes on for extended periods of time.

On the other hand, if you're sitting somewhere and you're smoking, or reading, none of that seems to happen. I wonder if we're uncomfortable with other people's ability to do nothing.

Re: Doing something is better than doing nothing for most people: study (2014)

#29
post #28

Our society isn't exactly set up for "doing nothing", either. If you're just sitting somewhere without doing anything, you might be loitering, you'll start getting funny looks if this goes on for extended periods of time. On the other hand, if you're sitting somewhere and you're smoking, or reading, none of that seems to happen. I wonder if we're uncomfortable with other people's ability to do nothing .

>“All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.”

From a philosopher writing in the 1600s. I don't think it's an issue with any particular society. It just seems part of human nature to be inable to sit and do nothing for a significant period of time.

Post reply on HN