What is the author's thesis? I skimmed and read and re-read, but didn't figure it out. It's well known that elite universities are elitist in their admissions and have over-large endowments. And the elite universities have acted on it, and many of their new classes are very different. And it's well known that the rest of the U.S. educational system is underfunded. > Sen. Tom Cotton, of all political leaders, suggeste…
> And the elite universities have acted on it, and many of their new classes are very different. No less elitist though. The idea of a selective college is elitist. The more selective, the more elitist. All the progressive talk is cant.
> No less elitist though. The idea of a selective college is elitist.
What does that mean? By that definition, everything selective is 'elitist', including my high school wrestling team. By non-elitist, we generally mean it's not biased in favor of the people who are already in society's elite.
Some top colleges now admit much more economically and ethnically diverse students. I've seen the applications, and they've reduced processes that select for children of the elite (such as standardized tests). In other words, they aren't admitting the children of elite (or not as much) - I think that is meaningful.
(I wish I could provide some citations, but I don't have time or anything at my fingertips.)
> All the progressive talk is cant.
Am I responding to nothing more than mindless anti-progressivism?