DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
1–10 of 312 posts
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#2Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#3Both statements are probably true, but the parenthetical (eventually) is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#4Saying RL is sufficient to (eventually) achieve AGI is a bit misleading. One might similarly state that biological evolution is sufficient to (eventually) achieve biological general intelligence. Both statements are probably true, but the parenthetical (eventually) is doing an awful lot of heavy lifting.
We won't be able to tell whether it's AGI or just good enough at trained tasks to trick us.
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#5Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#6Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#7This article is interesting, I even skimmed through their paper. But I think still the question remains: How to find the unified reward function? Or in other words, how to find answer to life? [It cannot be 42].
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#8Wait isn’t any Turing complete programming language sufficient to eventually reach general AI
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#9on a serious note the only positive outcome of all this shameless PR is that the heavy investment in ML/RL might trickle down to actual science labs and fundamental neuroscience research which might move us forward towards understanding natural intelligence, a prerequisite for creating an artificial one.
Re: DeepMind says reinforcement learning is ‘enough’ to reach general AI
#10Wait isn’t any Turing complete programming language sufficient to eventually reach general AI