[deleted]
It sadly isn't censorship resistant, but it should do for a few years, and as soon as censorship on IPFS starts to become an issue, hopefully the IPFS developers will evolve the design.
11–20 of 196 posts
[deleted]
It sadly isn't censorship resistant, but it should do for a few years, and as soon as censorship on IPFS starts to become an issue, hopefully the IPFS developers will evolve the design.
This is a useful note on using PACs to set up proxies for just one site: > Incidentally, you do not need to be running a web server to use the .pac file. You can access it via a file:// type URL. For example (note the 3 slashes): file:///Users/username/Library/proxy.pac http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=2004010109555326...
There are lots of sites UK ISPs block even though the sites themselves are not illegal or host illegal content. For e.g. torrent indexing services (the content itself may be illegal but purely providing a search across that content is basically doing what Google do).
The UK internet is heavily filtered/censored and so doing this is useful anyway.
Business ISP connections don't seem to be restricted. And neither do most cloud providers I've tried.
Might be better than using temporary proxies.
By the way, Sci-Hub has stopped adding new articles to the database for a few months now (background: https://www.reddit.com/r/scihub/comments/mk46x4/scihub_v_els... ). It would be great to develop a truly decentralised solution. Having a database of individual torrent links for each paper might be a start.
What is forcing these UK ISPs to block these IP ranges?
Also: all data is required to be logged, and those logs are searchable by civil servants without a warrant.
Having SciHub as a hidden service would bring a lot of people to Tor.
EDIT: apparently I'm a bit stupid; it exists: https://scihub22266oqcxt.onion
But it would be cool to promote the hell out of the onion address and tor browser, rather than trying to bypass ISP restrictions.
Obviously another solution on linux is to install a local recursive DNS resolver and be done with it... I'm quite happy with knot-resolver (kresd).
If they're doing that you'd be better off using D-o-T or D-o-H, to protect your DNS from interference.