Live data from Hacker News

FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

apple.com

91–100 of 199 posts

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#91
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even Microsoft couldn’t do it, gave up, and just used Blink. I assume management just saw how much of each release was spent being bug compatible with Chrome and decided it wasn’t worth it.

Microsoft dropping EdgeHTML was the biggest blow to the open web in many years. I really hope that Mozilla can pull some magic to keep Google from maintaining basically full control of web standards.

Bullshit. Microsoft adopting Chromium was the single biggest boon for the open web in many years. By reducing the friction for creating powerful web apps, it closes the gap for what is possible in competition with walled-garden app stores.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Microsoft dropping EdgeHTML was the biggest blow to the open web in many years. I really hope that Mozilla can pull some magic to keep Google from maintaining basically full control of web standards.

I wish Microsoft would buy Mozilla, restart Send, and make FF great again.

As much as I am losing faith in Mozilla I think acquisition by Microsoft is a losing move. Especially after we saw them dump EdgeHTML.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#93
post #49

It may seem an advantage to use the latest cutting edge features of a single platform, instead of using well established standards which are compatible with every browser. Sure, you are going to leave out some small minority of users, but you gain access to many new features. However, you are helping push the web become an increasingly centralized place, controlled by just a few entities, with interests which are ver…

> you are helping push the web become an increasingly centralized place Does it? Open source standardization is a good thing. Still not sure why html/css/js engine should be the exception. No one is calling for competition for QR code, torrent protocol, or the other billion of very dominant open source projects.

It's not really open source standardization though. Google is in charge, make no mistake. Yes people can take it and tweak it, but the main feature changes are dictated by Google.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#94
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really! My respect for France has gone up a few notches.

Don't get too excited, in France there's a tax on all storage devices (sd cards, usb sticks, hdds, laptops, phones etc) to help subsidise the record and film industry...

Germany has that too. Even on paper, since you could copy pages under copyright.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#95
post #85
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Next time that your manager asks you if you can have that sweet feature, instead of saying "sure, we just need to drop support for Firefox", please consider trying to explain what are the consequences in the long term. If the future of the web relies on developers groveling at the feet of a manager, then there's no fight or discussion to be had, because the web has already unequivocally lost. The only thing that's…

> If the future of the web relies on developers groveling at the feet of a manager, I see a lot of this 'devs v suits' type language used on HN, with the implication being that the developers are principled stewards of technology suffering under the cosh of KPI-obsessed MBAs. What causes this? The majority of product managers I've met have technical backgrounds, and they have also had to cut corners to keep their pro…

From what I've seen, it doesn't matter if they have a technical background. Hubris operates the same way in people—it serves to blind them of all but their own ambitions as they lose a more complete picture of reality in favour of expressing their egos.

At least in cases that line up. I doubt it's so universal. I've seen something quite similar happen first hand. To the point that I'm pretty beside myself about it. Hard to understand if you don't just assign it to them steamrolling anything but their ego. It's the only way you could just let core functions in your core product falter and not have a plan for it.

That said, I don't think that applies to excluding Firefox in this particular case. It doesn't sound permanent, and it sounds like it just hinges on FF catching up their available APIs to suit.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#96
post #49

It may seem an advantage to use the latest cutting edge features of a single platform, instead of using well established standards which are compatible with every browser. Sure, you are going to leave out some small minority of users, but you gain access to many new features. However, you are helping push the web become an increasingly centralized place, controlled by just a few entities, with interests which are ver…

What a deeply ignorant perspective. Too infuriating to ignore. Firefox users constitute my webrtc-based video conference app doesn't currently support ff and never will unless compatibility with chrome's implementation comes around. My manager would have me committed if I tried to pull that shit, and I'm already notorious for refusing to do things on principle. Suggesting that we don't support firefox because I'm laz…

Just to note, Apple made no mention of Safari because then you are on an Apple platform, where you always have available the actual FaceTime app

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can count the number of developers I've worked with over the last 5 years that care about it working in any browser other than Chrome on one finger. This idea that only Chrome matters is absolutely coming from the bottom up and when you point out something broken in Safari the first response from them is "Does it work in Chrome?" before they even look at it because they themselves don't even test in a second browse…

> This idea that only Chrome matters is absolutely coming from the bottom up and when you point out something broken in Safari the first response from them is "Does it work in Chrome?" before they even look at it because they themselves don't even test in a second browser. I would have thought at least iOS Safari would be a major consideration for anyone due to the ubiquity of iOS devices.

Ubiquity of iOS devices? They are only about 15% of smartphones.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#99
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can count the number of developers I've worked with over the last 5 years that care about it working in any browser other than Chrome on one finger. This idea that only Chrome matters is absolutely coming from the bottom up and when you point out something broken in Safari the first response from them is "Does it work in Chrome?" before they even look at it because they themselves don't even test in a second browse…

That mirrors my experience. It's not POs or PMs that hear about some new niche browser feature only supported by Chrome. It's devs that want to play with the latest toys and kind of look at you weird if you use Safari. There's an annoying assumption from other devs that I must be using Safari out of ignorance. They quickly get over it, but it's a problematic first impression thing when working with new teams.

Oh man, I split my time between Safari and Firefox. I must be some kind of sicko.

Re: FaceTime on the web requires Chrome or Edge, no mention of Firefox

#100
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They do but who doesn't? Apple isn't different than any other tech companies. That said, yes, the global south produces for west in slave like conditions and it's sad.

It's a sad reality of society, but it doesn't have to be. I guess one of my biggest issues with modern day slavery is that the companies that exploit these poorer nations often paint a deceptive picture that everything is above board. And whats worse is that these companies have the audacity to get behind social movements. Its predatory and just another scheme to improve their bottom line and lull their customers int…

"The west" is getting exploited by those companies aswell.

They don't really pay many taxes and abuse every loop hole they can.

Humans just can't ever play fair and be content with anything, they just always need to push for more.

Post reply on HN