Live data from Hacker News

Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

washingtonpost.com

191–200 of 261 posts

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I also think it would open a whole can of worms Absolutely. Apple should be afraid of holding the gatekeeper position. Anyone should. When people can install and use whatever they want, safety becomes their responsibility. They should open up their platform and let people do their own due dilligence. If they assume that responsibility and then neglect it, they absolutely can and should be blamed for any problems.

If Apple gave up the gatekeeping position, I would be afraid to use my phone for the things I do today.

You should already be afraid now.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I also think it would open a whole can of worms Absolutely. Apple should be afraid of holding the gatekeeper position. Anyone should. When people can install and use whatever they want, safety becomes their responsibility. They should open up their platform and let people do their own due dilligence. If they assume that responsibility and then neglect it, they absolutely can and should be blamed for any problems.

If Apple gave up the gatekeeping position, I would be afraid to use my phone for the things I do today.

The point is, you should be afraid today too (or better word, more careful). What you have right now is a false sense of security.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I also think it would open a whole can of worms Absolutely. Apple should be afraid of holding the gatekeeper position. Anyone should. When people can install and use whatever they want, safety becomes their responsibility. They should open up their platform and let people do their own due dilligence. If they assume that responsibility and then neglect it, they absolutely can and should be blamed for any problems.

If Apple gave up the gatekeeping position, I would be afraid to use my phone for the things I do today.

Why aren't you afraid today? Their gatekeeping is clearly useless.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't. It absolves Apple of any responsibility in the matter.

Why does anyone want to help Apple? Shouldn't we be focused on user safety?

We're not helping Apple. We're holding them accountable for what they make available on their store which they advertise as "curated and safe".

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have sympathy for the person in this story, but I think shifting the blame to Apple in this case is ludicrous. I'm still somewhat shaking my head that someone went through all of the trouble of using a hardware wallet, and then entered his key words into the first app he downloaded. If anything I think this story is just a prime example of why irreversible crypto transactions are an absolute nightmare for the gener…

The problem isn't that Apple should be responsible and isn't, the problem is Apple is extremely paternalistic but in a way where it gets all the powers but skirts all the responsibilities. If the responsibility is too impossible (and I'm fine saying that it is), then their paternalism shouldn't be called out and their reputation knocked down a rung or two. Instead, they get to keep a reputation which is far better th…

> Instead, they get to keep a reputation which is far better than the other megacorps'.

I think this is what having strong marketing gets you. You can see from the defence on HN/Twitter where most people would be fine with Apple having a control over all their devices and aren't afraid of the growing dominance of a single company.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So does that mean that you can sue Apple if an app fails at any of these? Of course not, because lying for Apple is common business practice nowadays.

"no reasonable person would possibly believe these statements as true." That statement from the courts has allowed all sorts of lying in marketing.

Marketing is about to become a synonym to lying in the legal sense... therefore lying is ok.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#198
post #2

The worst thing is, people have this belief that Apple is somehow protecting them, so they offload the critical thinking to Apple and lower their own guards. For example, a person thought he was getting a legitimate Bitcoin wallet app, but turns out it was a fake and he lost his life savings [1]. edit: to be clear, I'm not blaming Apple for not stopping these scams, at their scale, it's just practically impossible to…

”At their scale” excuses are the worst. It’s one thing that scale will cause a tiny percentage to create a large number of cases. But if it makes the percentage go up, it’s a sign you need to scale back down until you figure out how not to get people hurt. No one forced you to be humongous scale.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Apple gave up the gatekeeping position, I would be afraid to use my phone for the things I do today.

Why aren't you afraid today? Their gatekeeping is clearly useless.

> Why aren't you afraid today? Their gatekeeping is clearly useless.

You're not perfect at anything you do. Does that make you useless? Of course not.

Re: Apple’s tightly controlled App Store is teeming with scams

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I also think it would open a whole can of worms Absolutely. Apple should be afraid of holding the gatekeeper position. Anyone should. When people can install and use whatever they want, safety becomes their responsibility. They should open up their platform and let people do their own due dilligence. If they assume that responsibility and then neglect it, they absolutely can and should be blamed for any problems.

Yes and likewise, car manufacturers should remove seatbelts and airbags. They simply encourage reckless driving, and by giving the false sense of security / assuming the gatekeeper role, they should be liable for any accident.

The big difference between "Apple's app review process" and "seatbelts and airbags" is that car companies acknowledge the latter are fallible.

It's not about adding layers of protection or not; it's about being transparent with your customers about how effective those layers actually are.

Post reply on HN