Live data from Hacker News

G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

bbc.co.uk

631–640 of 931 posts

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#631
post #616

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's all sorts of outcomes here. While you may be right that the US will not sign on to the deal it might still have to deal with some consequences. E.g. while Yellen may not have the ability influence US tax laws there are also foreign tax laws that are part of this over which McConnell has no control. Let's say the rest of the G7/G20/OECD changes the way they tax global companies, if the US doesn't ratify their…

>> I think Yellen's agreement does count as in this is the US's (sort of foreign policy?) No it doesn't work like that. To get anything done, you need Republican votes. I have no idea, I haven't checked this afternoon, how many Republican votes do you have for a minimum corporate tax? That's what I want to know, I'm guessing it is zero, but let me know what the number is.

Reconciliation requires no Republican votes.

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2021/02/05/what-is-r...

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#632

>> The G7 group of advanced economies has reached a "historic" deal to make multinational companies pay more tax No, it hasn't. Some finance ministers met and talked: "Finance ministers meeting in London agreed to battle tax avoidance by making companies pay more in the countries where they do business. They also agreed in principle to a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% to avoid countries undercutting each ot…

You're referring to the process of finalizing a treaty. That would be conceptually similar to "executing" an agreement between parties—the most important step that makes it legally binding! But "reaching a deal" and "executing the agreement" are often different steps. When we have discussions with a client, and we negotiate on the terms we can reach an agreement on the negotiation before we actually execute the contr…

[deleted]

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#633

>> The G7 group of advanced economies has reached a "historic" deal to make multinational companies pay more tax No, it hasn't. Some finance ministers met and talked: "Finance ministers meeting in London agreed to battle tax avoidance by making companies pay more in the countries where they do business. They also agreed in principle to a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15% to avoid countries undercutting each ot…

You're referring to the process of finalizing a treaty. That would be conceptually similar to "executing" an agreement between parties—the most important step that makes it legally binding! But "reaching a deal" and "executing the agreement" are often different steps. When we have discussions with a client, and we negotiate on the terms we can reach an agreement on the negotiation before we actually execute the contr…

[deleted]

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#634
post #509
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Anyway this could be the push that the EU needed to start their own Silicon Valley. Given the combined market caps of Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon (~$5.6T) is larger than the national net worth of all but the four largest EU countries, I don’t think there’s a lack of motivation here.

You can't compare market cap to GDP. If you compare to actual net ( you're actually comparing GDP) worth the numbers are very different.

No, I am not using GDP, when I wrote “national net worth”, I meant exactly that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_wea...

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#635
post #445

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maybe such people could be shared a per-share fine based on shares held at a particular date? I think it’s nearly impossible to expect most shareholders to understand the business underpinnings to this degree within the existing system. Think of pensioners with mutual funds, do you think most even understand all the businesses in those funds let alone the operations of those businesses? To me, this is akin at emplo…

You are responsible for your property. If you own stock, you own part of a company so you are responsible for its actions. In the case of mutual funds, it's the funds' job to understand the businesses it invests in for you. There could be an exception for non-voting stock though.

Well this is just false. You are not at all responsible for a company’s actions just because you are a shareholder. HN is evidently quite out of its depth with these kinds of threads.

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#636

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> I think Yellen's agreement does count as in this is the US's (sort of foreign policy?) No it doesn't work like that. To get anything done, you need Republican votes. I have no idea, I haven't checked this afternoon, how many Republican votes do you have for a minimum corporate tax? That's what I want to know, I'm guessing it is zero, but let me know what the number is.

Reconciliation requires no Republican votes. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2021/02/05/what-is-r...

[deleted]

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#637

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're referring to the process of finalizing a treaty. That would be conceptually similar to "executing" an agreement between parties—the most important step that makes it legally binding! But "reaching a deal" and "executing the agreement" are often different steps. When we have discussions with a client, and we negotiate on the terms we can reach an agreement on the negotiation before we actually execute the contr…

>> After reaching satisfactory terms in the agreement, I need to run the agreement by my business partner and ensure he approves Do you think Mitch McConnell sees US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen as his business partner? Or vice versa? That's your perception? >> The G7 has reached a deal—that doesn't mean the deal is now effective or legally binding So if I'm negotiating with you and you tell me we have a deal, I s…

>> So if I'm negotiating with you and you tell me we have a deal, I should consider that to be something that may or may not happen, may or may not be effective, and may or may not be legally binding?

I hope you don't touch contracts in your job. Until a contract is signed nothing is official.

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#638
post #532

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UK already has an 18% GST rate, which is equivalent to an 18% tax on revenues. In 2020, Apple had revenues of $274B and pre-tax net income of $67B. On which, they paid $10B in income tax (a 15% rate). Apple revenues in the UK was about $2B. Which means Apple is already paying $360mil in GST tax to the UK gov. Apple also paid some amount of wage, income, real-estate and other taxes. Let's imagine companies had to…

> The UK already has an 18% GST rate, which is equivalent to an 18% tax on revenues. No, GST is a VAT (in fact, the UK’s is called a VAT, not a GST), which is not the same as a revenue tax.

The majority of Apple's sales is to consumers, so it's equivalent for the sake of argument.

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#639

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> I think Yellen's agreement does count as in this is the US's (sort of foreign policy?) No it doesn't work like that. To get anything done, you need Republican votes. I have no idea, I haven't checked this afternoon, how many Republican votes do you have for a minimum corporate tax? That's what I want to know, I'm guessing it is zero, but let me know what the number is.

Reconciliation requires no Republican votes. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2021/02/05/what-is-r...

You are not going to ratify a treaty with the required 2/3 votes in the Senate via reconciliation.

Re: G7: Rich nations back deal to tax multinationals

#640

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is one asset you can't hide - land. Tax that.

I predict your proposal will significantly increase the demand for yachts.

Yachts are depreciating assets that don't confer the ability to rent-seek. Let them buy yachts.
Post reply on HN