Tether as an organization operates with no transparency, and has a toxic symbiotic relationship with exchanges. I'm certain that Tether has backroom relationships with major exchanges - Tether provides liquidity to exchanges in the form of short term USDT loans. So Tether can claim their issues are backed by real reserves https://tether.to/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/tether-march-31... , omitting the convenient fact t…
>I'm certain that Tether has backroom relationships with major exchanges - Tether provides liquidity to exchanges in the form of short term USDT loans. Is there a reason why exchanges even need such loans?
Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
91–100 of 241 posts
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#92Tether as an organization operates with no transparency, and has a toxic symbiotic relationship with exchanges. I'm certain that Tether has backroom relationships with major exchanges - Tether provides liquidity to exchanges in the form of short term USDT loans. So Tether can claim their issues are backed by real reserves https://tether.to/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/tether-march-31... , omitting the convenient fact t…
>I'm certain that Tether has backroom relationships with major exchanges - Tether provides liquidity to exchanges in the form of short term USDT loans. Is there a reason why exchanges even need such loans?
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've heard "it's a scam" a lot recently, but nobody can articulate how in a way that is similar to any real, provable scam in the past. It's a giant, distributed scam?
I think its based on a fundamental idea of buying something that you know is worthless in order to sell it for more than you bought it by convincing the buyer that it isn't worthless. Eventually it will burn through all potential buyers and there will be no one left to sell to. Then it collapses because everyone finally agrees that it actually has no value.
Some cryptos have value beyond that, like ETH, because the Ethereum network itself has intrinsic value, and ETH is the only thing you can use to pay the Gas fees if you want a program running on the network.
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that the 8.6% return is contingent on those funds being loaned out to third parties in a manner that involves risk (like margin trading), I am highly skeptical of their ability to not lose your money on the timeline of a decade. The trustworthiness of Blockfi doesn't matter if they mess up and end up loaning money to someone who ends up unable to pay the bill - and the person on the hook if the borrower does no…
The thing is though that most all of these crypto lending platforms only offer over collateralized loans, so the risk of them being screwed over by lack of payment from the person taking the loan is negligible. Meaning If I want to lend $100 worth of USDC I must give $200 as collateral worth of BTC to get the loan. Where if that $200 worth of BTC drops to a worth of $100, it's liquidated, paying off your loan, leavin…
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#95Earlier quoted context omitted.
To paraphrase: - when a company goes bust you still have shares your share -- no one wants to pay for them with dollars. - when tether implodes you still have your tether, but you can't turn it into dollars because there aren't any dollars to convert it too.
Wasn't that GC's point though? The run-on-a-bank analogy only applies if you are holding Tether when it happens. If you are rightfully paranoid about Tether and therefore don't hold any, what is the damage for you?
Even if you don’t keep any money in a bank, banks collapsing would still hurt you. The stock market crashing hurts more than just people who own stock.
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#96Tether is very good for borrowing, if you think it might collapse. You can borrow a large amount, buy a hard asset with the borrowings, and if it collapses you'll only need to pay back at a discount. (Not advice) I am beginning to think that it would be worse if USDT went over the peg rather than under! Therefore, it would not surprise me if the Tether FUD might be intentional - otherwise Tether might start "collapsi…
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that the 8.6% return is contingent on those funds being loaned out to third parties in a manner that involves risk (like margin trading), I am highly skeptical of their ability to not lose your money on the timeline of a decade. The trustworthiness of Blockfi doesn't matter if they mess up and end up loaning money to someone who ends up unable to pay the bill - and the person on the hook if the borrower does no…
Dollar yields in the crypto universe have forever been higher. I've consistently got 12-25% per year from 2015 using exchanges like Bitfinex and haven't lost a single dollar. Why isn't it arbitrated away? Because institutions and market makers don't trust crypto. When they do, I'm sure it'll go as low as rest of market rates.
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#98I think the most important thing to keep in mind is that EVERYONE knows Tether is a complete farce and this is already priced into the market.
Does that imply that "the market" would rise if Tether was eliminated? Why not do it?
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hold a decent sized block of USDC via BlockFi and earn 8.6% APY. I realize there is inherent risk (after all, I am earning 8.6%) but compare that to 0.5% earned at Goldman Sachs or traditional FDIC insured bank accounts and it's a risk I am willing to take. By default, BlockFi issues GUSD as their stablecoin of choice, but Gemini (GUSD) market cap is only $145m, whereas USDC market cap is 22 with a B billion. Ultim…
It doesn't make sense to compare risk-free FDIC-insured deposits to stablecoins at BlockFi. Full disclosure: I did not find BlockFi's brief descriptions of their risk management strategies to be comforting.
Re: Bitcoin’s reliance on stablecoins harks back to the Wild West of finance
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wasn't that GC's point though? The run-on-a-bank analogy only applies if you are holding Tether when it happens. If you are rightfully paranoid about Tether and therefore don't hold any, what is the damage for you?
Isn’t this like saying a run on the banks won’t damage you if you keep your money in a mattress? Even if you don’t keep any money in a bank, banks collapsing would still hurt you. The stock market crashing hurts more than just people who own stock.
As an example, let's say Capital One has been fractional banking (as they all do) but for some reason people get paranoid about it and there is a run on the bank. Everyone tries to withdraw money Capital One doesn't have. As long as the govt doesn't step in and socialize losses on the back of the taxpayer, you're left with a bunch of people who had "deposits" at Capital One that are now non-existent because Capital One doesn't have any money left. Those people are of course hurt, but the person who only banks with Chase would be hurt how?