Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anything to do with goodreads becomes toxic. I think that's because the types of people who read and opine about books to the extent they feel compelled to blog/review on gr, are also likely to be the types of people who brook no dissent to their opinions, neither of authors, books nor the things they make them mean. They're independent, self-trusting, artistic thinkers (in the manner of Nietzsche), and the act of en…
I am looking at your comment history here and I suspect that the case is more that anything to do with you becomes toxic; I see multiple instances of you insulting people, then insisting that they’re the ones hurling abuse and arguing in bad faith when they protest.
It must be hard to scrape out a living especially with all that talent I mean I see where you're coming from. But it's quite sad isn't it to be embittered and feel you should have got so much more ... by now. I get why you'd feel you need to seek these little consolations I just hope that in future you could seek them without trying to harm or abuse others. well you must be bully. you frame in a completely backwards self-serving way my response to bullying bheaviour. showing you just want people to get abused and be silent, if it's you doing the abuse. nice work, bully. a biased self-serving reading, from someone triggerd by a goodreads critique, married with non-sequitur abusie langauge? girl, oh girl, how surprising. further triggered by good reads, thanks proving my point. clearly you brook no dissent to your little despotic opinions, now that i disagree with you you pretend i'm toxic. the only bad faith here is that biased reading of yours, and the only toxicity is from you, everything you touch must be like that, no matter how talented you are, because of your willingness to bully and attack and abuse others simply because they disagree with you, while pretending you're not doing so. I forgive you.