Live data from Hacker News

Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

businessinsider.com

121–130 of 1001 posts

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#121

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> People can be critical of the state of Israel Sadly the moment you call out Israel's human rights violations and ethnic cleansing you get automatically branded as antisemitic on all major social media and by most mainstream outlets too.

You must be on a different social media outlet than I am.

You are in a tread this very moment that shows proof of his opinion.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Nothing he posted was offensive. > “If I were a Jew I would be concerned about my insatiable appetite for war and killing in defense of myself” How about that?

As I said, Israel conflates being a Jew with the state of Israel. And as such, people associate Israel with Judaism. That’s not offensive if it’s by design. You can’t have your cake and eat it to. Israel is an apartheid state.

It doesn't matter how much Israel attempts to conflate Zionism with Judaism. Pre-judging all Jews because of it is antisemitic.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#123

The post is now deleted, but is available at https://web.archive.org/web/20210601160519/https://www.kamau... Repeated here for clarity: > If I were a Jew today, my sensibilities would be tormented. I would find it increasingly difficult to reconcile the long cycles of oppression that Jewish people have endured and the insatiable appetite for vengeful violence that Israel, my homeland, has now acquired. This reconcili…

Thanks for the full context. Much of the reaction here is due to his mistake of placing 'If I were a Jew' when based on the rest of the essay I'd estimate he meant to say 'If I were Israeli'. Had he done so the tea shop would still have all its crockery intact.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#124
post #12

This is the only instance relating to offensive social media I've ever heard of where someone got reassigned and not fired

Examples of people getting reassigned and not fired: https://www.clickorlando.com/news/2018/12/20/orlando-officer... https://www.wtxl.com/news/local-news/assistant-principal-at-... https://www.wgvunews.org/post/black-detroit-police-officer-r... https://www.kwtx.com/content/news/Waco-ISD-hires-teacher-who... https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/07/16/sheriffs-chief-of-sta...

Notice a pattern here? I wasn't talking about cops and teachers who have unions with political clout. Cops have done a hell of a lot worse then go on racist rants just to be reassigned. It's not apples to apples.

But just to be over the top obnoxiously clear. I'm talking about the private sector.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#126

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The popular understanding of Jewish in America is Ashkenazi

The average American doesn't know an Ashkenazi from an alpaca.

Yes, but the average American also thinks of an Ashkenazi Jew when they think of a Jew, and has no idea that Sephardim & mizrahim even exist, even if they don't know the words for any of it.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The average American doesn't know an Ashkenazi from an alpaca.

Yes, but the average American also thinks of an Ashkenazi Jew when they think of a Jew, and has no idea that Sephardim & mizrahim even exist, even if they don't know the words for any of it.

OP's point is to refer to these people as Ashkenazi. To think of them as that, instead of (or perhaps in addition to) as Jewish.

My point is we are a long way away from that, despite how many Ashkenazi Jews live in the US.

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#128
post #37

Slightly shocking that he didn't get fired. (yet?) They fired Damore for writing an email that was tone-deaf, insensitive, but largely supported by research. Bobb goes on a clearly antisemitic rant, and just gets reassigned. Is Google inconsistent, or has their policy on how to deal with these things changed over the past few years?

A blog post from 13 years ago.. which has since been removed.. is different from an email sent internally. Hopefully nobody will hold me accountable to all the slashdot comments I wrote 10-15 years ago. Taken out of context, I've probably made fantastically horrific statements too.

Are you the head of diversity? If no, then it doesn't matters. You won't have outsized power and influence.

Kind of hard to claim diversity matters when you install a demonstrable racist at the top.

Who else is he discriminating against that we just haven't found yet?

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#129
If you supported the firing of Antonio Garcia Martinez this should make you happy. If you thought that Apple overstepped their bounds by punishing a new hire for old creative work, this should outrage you, too.

Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a lot of consistency in peoples' views on these two closely related incidents. Why?

Re: Google removes its head of diversity after 2007 blog post surfaces

#130
post #37

Slightly shocking that he didn't get fired. (yet?) They fired Damore for writing an email that was tone-deaf, insensitive, but largely supported by research. Bobb goes on a clearly antisemitic rant, and just gets reassigned. Is Google inconsistent, or has their policy on how to deal with these things changed over the past few years?

>Is Google inconsistent, or has their policy on how to deal with these things changed over the past few years? Simple explanation is Google's Democrat-leaning leadership are more aligned with Bobb than Damore (in the US, the left are generally anti-Israel while the right support it, and the left are pro-affirmative-action while the right oppose it).

Yes, people on the Left haven't realized women's innate biological tendency towards neuroticism, which renders affirmative action self-defeating.
Post reply on HN