Earlier quoted context omitted.
Spotify has video for some titles, particularly pop.
Usually its like a 30 second loop vs an actual music video.
YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
201–210 of 463 posts
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#202Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#203A few days ago, I clicked an age restricted video on Youtube and usually I just state that I am above 18 but now they ask for a credit card number or an identity card to prove it. I am not going to send this just to watch some random video clip that users have declared not appropriate to a young audience because it features a zombie. Seriously!
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#204A few days ago, I clicked an age restricted video on Youtube and usually I just state that I am above 18 but now they ask for a credit card number or an identity card to prove it. I am not going to send this just to watch some random video clip that users have declared not appropriate to a young audience because it features a zombie. Seriously!
EU citizens needs to convince their government(s) that these age restrictions are not acceptable or live with the status quo.
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#205Am I the only one who didn't even know that youtube had age-restricted videos? Somehow I have managed to watch it for years without ever getting prompted for age confirmation!
Google got a pretty big fine in US due to not properly gating things for minors on YouTube (based on COPPA law). I guess this is now the result.
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you, by chance, using Brave? I've noticed that recently with Brave as well. Didn't seem to happen in Chrome even when viewing the same videos on the same machine.
Firefox. Dark pattern to get people to use Chrome?
I strongly suspect that at least part of the reason for these is to discourage people from using Google's properties with browsers other than Chrome (whether it was the reason for creating them, or just noted as a benefit for refusing to fix them once they were identified).
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#207Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#208Earlier quoted context omitted.
I set my age to about 3 months old in Skype and got locked out. They need my CC to verify my age because of COPA (child online protection act in the US) or something.
But other websites don't do this, so I don't think it's a COPPA thing.
It was bad, actually, because they had developed a system where your username on the system was tied to your in-game nickname as well so I ended up locked out of both and had to create a new username/nick.
The admin of the website literally said "there's nothing I can do". I'm sure this isn't to do with the law specifically but just some limitation of their tools.
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#209It's pretty infurating that I've had a Youtube account since 2006 (15 years ago), and now they're asking me whether i'm over 18. A basic calculation on their end could filter the accounts based on age, given the TOS of when they were created (e.g. if the TOS specified that I must be over 13, a 2006 account would mean I'm at least 28, therefore automatically verified).
So you didn't create your Google account at age 3? That's impossible!
Re: YouTube-dl can no longer download age-restricted videos
#210Earlier quoted context omitted.
AFAIK the age restriction credit card thing (inside the EU) is the result of some stupid law change (the Audiovisual Media Services Directive). Google probably doesn't want to validate users' age (because selling ads to impressionable kids is very lucrative) but they have to now.
Apparently you'll need to scan an ID if you don't have a credit card, and I bet the EU has millions of young adults without a credit card. Either way, the end result is that you cannot use a video service without exposing your real identity to the service provider. And for what? Is there an epidemic of video clips wrecking children's minds I'm not aware of? Lacking that, this doesn't seem even remotely justified. All…
I mean... maybe. I have young children and have no desire to have them anywhere near YouTube for essentially as long as possible _because_ of that very concern.