What was wrong with the better original title "The Chinese paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct"
Why would you want to omit that part?
That said, this title is a poor attempt at communication.
11–20 of 212 posts
What was wrong with the better original title "The Chinese paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct"
Why would you want to omit that part?
That said, this title is a poor attempt at communication.
What was wrong with the better original title "The Chinese paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct"
Perhaps because that title completely omits any form of attribution, which as the article suggests, is largely because of the Gezhouba Dam which completely cut paddlefish off from their only spawning grounds. Why would you want to omit that part? That said, this title is a poor attempt at communication.
> Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now extinct What does this mean?
Serious question here - not starting a flamewar. Are there any real organizations in China with power that protect the ecosystem and animals there? From an outsider it seems like they just build whatever they want without any concern for the environment they live in which ultimately will do significant damage to their own human population after the environment collapses and can't support them.
It mostly talking about how in the 80 and 90s they didn't do those preservation research when building dams.
The article also talks that its not only happening in China these old paddlefish species are endangered all over the globe.
> Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now extinct What does this mean?
> Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now extinct What does this mean?
I feel like someone somewhere should be wearing a black armband. Goodbye, giant paddlefish.
> Yangtze dam separates Paddlefish, largest, from spawn, now extinct What does this mean?
> Yangtze dam separated Paddlefish, largest (fish), from spawn; now extinct.
What was wrong with the better original title "The Chinese paddlefish, one of world's largest fish, has gone extinct"
Perhaps because that title completely omits any form of attribution, which as the article suggests, is largely because of the Gezhouba Dam which completely cut paddlefish off from their only spawning grounds. Why would you want to omit that part? That said, this title is a poor attempt at communication.