Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a good comparison insofar as the tools were/are primitive and only usable by experts. A lot of domain knowledge was required. You can hate crypto and still agree with me on the above point. It's a pretty innocuous observation. I'm not going to engage the rest of your argument which has no bearing on the point being made.
Yeah! My brother was an expert in 1990 at 6. Me at 6 in 93-94. Except we most certainly weren’t. You’re giving a completely wrong impression of how the early web was and the early internet. I wasn’t around for that so I won’t personally give my input but for the time, each iteration every few years was great. If domain knowledge wasn’t needed by the 90s. When was serious domain knowledge needed? When did that stop? S…
Comparing cryptocurrencies to the Internet is about comparing its usefulness, not it's understandability. I won't argue that people in general understood the Internet.
Take my example of Fidonet. If you were not a computer expert then you had never heard of Fidonet. BBSs? Maybe you'd heard of it in some news clip about the dangers of computers.
Hell, the only time non-experts even saw anything close to a BBS was probably the movie Wargames.
> You’re giving a completely wrong impression of how the early web was and the early internet.
In what way?
> I wasn’t around for that so I won’t personally give my input
You don't know, but you know I'm wrong about it?