Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 317 posts

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#51
post #17
post #14

Why not just pay for google photos?

Well, for one, if Google's ML decides to nuke your account, you lose your photos unless you have a blog, a lot of upvotes, and luck.

This is gonna be a risk with most cloud services. No matter what, you want to have a backup anyway.

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#52
post #35

Not even remotely an alternative in terms of usability/reliability, but I can describe my DIY setup. I have a DIY NAS, based on a Raspberry Pi and an external hard disk enclosure, running in my kitchen. The disks are encrypted with LUKS. A combination of Syncthing and a cron job ensure that photos from my phone are constantly synced to the NAS without any input from me, and old photos are removed from my phone. A nic…

I'm interested in your rassberry pi nas. Can it be done with a pi0? I've got one laying around and would love to put it to good use. I'm familiar with syncthing so it doesn't sound too much trouble for me right now.

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#53

If you're interested in a self hosted cloud, take a look at nextcloud. https://nextcloud.com/ I've been using for a couple months and been extremely happy with it.

Do you manage your own server or do you host it somewhere like AWS/Digital Ocean?

I do, on Digital Ocean.

I'm using DO's Spaces (S3) as file storage. I also suspect very strongly that it is the main source of the slowness of the nextcloud (but it is super cheap!).

The main pain in the ass is having to update every year or so. It usually works flawlessly, until it doesn't and I have to run a few manual commands. Other than that, it just works. 100% recommend it.

Mine is a personal instance, being used by 5 people (family). I've had the nextcloud and its postgres database running in a 5$ instance for years, no problem (I did add a bit of swap for the DB).

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#56

To be honest, $2/month isn't that unreasonable from a useful service. I would definitely class Google Photos as useful, especially its ability to search for pictures. I personally use iCloud, and back everything to a Synology.

It is not, however for some of us, there was an implicit “I let you datamine my images, you host them” relationship. Having to pay google tips the scales, so why not spend your $2 on a more privacy oriented service?

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because they are known for bait and switch; and even worse bait and shutdown? One bad click, or their AI screwing up might lock you out of all your photos and entire Google a/c? Among numerous other reasons. So while at it move away from one more Google service.

Is the bait an switch comment fair? Google have offered free photos for years and obviously the storage requirements must be growing huge. A business needs to be able to change. Also haven't they said on both the big changes anything in the past will be held as legacy under free and future uploads will go to storage? I think you have to accept business needs to adapt models sometimes and Google Photos is more this th…

They starved out any other provider who could offer photo storage with their free storage. Now they discover they need to charge for it.

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#58
OneDrive. If you can get 5 other people to go in on a family plan with you, it's $17/year for 1TB storage. You can get OneDrive app for your phones and tablets to auto sync camera roll, etc. to OneDrive. As an added bonus, OneDrive is really well integrated with Windows 10 (if you are a windows user) so your pictures will just magically show up on your system as files you can drag and drop.

Re: Ask HN: Alternatives to Google Photos?

#60
post #35

Not even remotely an alternative in terms of usability/reliability, but I can describe my DIY setup. I have a DIY NAS, based on a Raspberry Pi and an external hard disk enclosure, running in my kitchen. The disks are encrypted with LUKS. A combination of Syncthing and a cron job ensure that photos from my phone are constantly synced to the NAS without any input from me, and old photos are removed from my phone. A nic…

I have a similar setup, but with the Shotwell part replaced by Lychee. It's a self-hostable photo browsing web app. I can share photos with family members that way, like how I might share a google photo album to them.

Second for Lychee. If self-hosting, I would also recommend Piwigo. It has a nice complementary phone app.
Post reply on HN