Live data from Hacker News

Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

index.medium.com

41–50 of 228 posts

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#41

Just like Facebook: ignore the ”newsfeed” part, and the rest of the service is pretty decent. For Facebook that means e.g using the events functionality. For LinkedIn that’s private messages and network graphs (“do I know someone at X company”). The “feeds” that are front and center on both sites is the worst feature and in no way necessary for using the service. It’s their easiest method of ad delivery though, which…

Every time I try to use Twitter to follow interesting companies I get annoyed and quit because of the same garbage. I've been thinking it's an age thing, where people with better eyesight than me or who grew up looking at low SNR information like that can filter through it more easily. They need to put ads and suggestions and such nonsense off to the side and attract your eye by being worth looking at, not inline pretending to be part of your desired info feed.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#42
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can indeed curate, but I definitely get the vibe that cringe is the default mode on LinkedIn (which is still strictly better than Twitter’s default mode, toxicity).

Maybe, social media curation is a skill that not many people posess.

The default mode is unrelated to curation. Curation allows you to opt into a different mode, but it doesn’t change the default mode.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#43

I often wonder if LI is trying to do too many things at once. At this point it hard not to come to the conclusion that it promotes certain types of behaviors. The problem is that if left laissez-faire, the feed will not attract folks who abhor work influencers. So, perhaps they need to ask who they are really targeting? For generic work-banter, an app like Blind seems to cut it better. Given the anonymity, it is able…

Blind would be great if it didn't attract and retain the most toxic and reactive folks (in my brief experience). That attribute makes it an undesirable place to be for someone who's well adjusted at their job, which I would say undercuts your assertion that it provides a more accurate view of the workplace. A counterbalance to the polished view you'd get through LinkedIn? Sure. But it's where people go to talk shit.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#45

Just like Facebook: ignore the ”newsfeed” part, and the rest of the service is pretty decent. For Facebook that means e.g using the events functionality. For LinkedIn that’s private messages and network graphs (“do I know someone at X company”). The “feeds” that are front and center on both sites is the worst feature and in no way necessary for using the service. It’s their easiest method of ad delivery though, which…

Every time I try to use Twitter to follow interesting companies I get annoyed and quit because of the same garbage. I've been thinking it's an age thing, where people with better eyesight than me or who grew up looking at low SNR information like that can filter through it more easily. They need to put ads and suggestions and such nonsense off to the side and attract your eye by being worth looking at, not inline pre…

Don’t follow companies. Follow people. Also I recommend using an ad-free client even though they are hard to find I have learned.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#46
post #35

Makes perfect sense. In one of my previous roles, we used to keep track of SSI (Social Selling Index), and we would be gently nudged into posting about a few things (events, launches, etc.) I decided to game the system and shot up to the top of the rankings by simply posting actual useful stuff (pretty much the same commentary I would post on my personal link blog, but with some bearing on work topics). I quit doing…

How did you predict the best hashtags? That sounds interesting.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#47
post #22

I find LinkedIn really cringy. And I haven't seen ONE post there that actually added value to my life. It is also toxic as hell. But I know people who got employment offers from LinkedIn. So it adds value in that sense. I just mute and block those influencers. And check LinkedIn maybe twice a week. One of the things I cannot find any excuse for is how fake people are. They are behaving in a fake manner even when they…

You say you haven't seen a single post there that added value to your life. Hypothetically, if you saw a post that DID add value to your life, what would that post(s) look like?

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#48
post #22

I find LinkedIn really cringy. And I haven't seen ONE post there that actually added value to my life. It is also toxic as hell. But I know people who got employment offers from LinkedIn. So it adds value in that sense. I just mute and block those influencers. And check LinkedIn maybe twice a week. One of the things I cannot find any excuse for is how fake people are. They are behaving in a fake manner even when they…

There is one former military bigwig on there that is interesting for international relations topics.

Which mostly underscores your point.

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#49
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guess, it's like Twitter. If you follow the right people you get good content. The only thing bothering me on LinkedIn are the recruiters and that got much better in the last years. Most of the time I use it to stay in touch with old co-workers and to syndicate my articles, which sometimes (2-5 times a year) leads to new clients.

You can indeed curate, but I definitely get the vibe that cringe is the default mode on LinkedIn (which is still strictly better than Twitter’s default mode, toxicity).

What would a better social media platform look like in your opinion?

Re: Shameless Work Influencers Are the Bane of LinkedIn

#50

> a vast circle jerk in the cloud Well, that has the ring of truth, when applied to the newsfeed. And the final conclusion that you should just get on linkedin when job searching and then get off again is fine. I find it incredibly useful for job searching, to the point that I don't even bother with other sites. However, the job search experience is badly spoiled by secondary recruitment postings. These are especiall…

"a vast circle jerk in the cloud" is got to be one of the best descriptions of the LinkedIn feed I've heard!

What do you think the ideal social media feed would look like?

Post reply on HN