QUIC is now RFC 9000

#1

Post by blucell » Fri, May 28, 2021, 12:25 AM UTC

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#2

Post by corndoge » Fri, May 28, 2021, 12:56 AM UTC

Off topic, but doesn't GDPR stipulate[0] that cookie consent dialogs cannot have non-essential options that are by default opted in? This page seems to have those.

> The use of pre-ticked opt-in boxes is invalid underthe GDPR. Silence orinactivity on the part of the data subject, as well as merely proceeding with a service cannot beregarded as an active indication of choice.

[0] https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/default/files/files/file1/edpb_...

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#3

Post by someguy101010 » Fri, May 28, 2021, 12:56 AM UTC

https://www.fastly.com/why-fastly-loves-quic-http3 is a 404 on this page fyi

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#4

Post by infogulch » Fri, May 28, 2021, 12:58 AM UTC

Should have waited for 9001.

Oh my mistake, they have several RFCs from 8999-9002.

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#5

Post by p2t2p » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:02 AM UTC

THIS RFC LEVEL IS OVER 9000.

I'm sorry, I'll show myself out.

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#6

Post by verst » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:02 AM UTC

infogulch wrote: post #4

Should have waited for 9001. Oh my mistake, they have several RFCs from 8999-9002.

From the article :)

> The IETF just published QUIC as RFC 9000, supported by RFC 9001, RFC 9002, and RFC 8999

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#7

Post by dantillberg » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:21 AM UTC

someguy101010 wrote: post #3

https://www.fastly.com/why-fastly-loves-quic-http3 is a 404 on this page fyi

It appears they've fixed the link to https://www.fastly.com/blog/why-fastly-loves-quic-http3.

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#8

Post by cj » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:22 AM UTC

someguy101010 wrote: post #3

https://www.fastly.com/why-fastly-loves-quic-http3 is a 404 on this page fyi

A quick google search surfaces the correct link. My 10 second root cause analysis: they changed the title of the blog post.

https://www.fastly.com/blog/why-fastly-loves-quic-http3

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#9

Post by 1MachineElf » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:26 AM UTC

infogulch wrote: post #4

Should have waited for 9001. Oh my mistake, they have several RFCs from 8999-9002.

Haven't heard this meme for a long time now. Reminds me of the old days when my main email was muahahaha9001@inbox.com simply to get laughs out of people. (That email service shut down roughly 5 years ago.)

Re: QUIC is now RFC 9000

#10

Post by hydrox24 » Fri, May 28, 2021, 1:28 AM UTC

Have previous protocols (TCP, UDP, etc) been in widespread use before their respective RFCs?

The QUIC Wikipedia page[0] makes it sound like a substantial amount of traffic, due largely to Facebook, Google, and the Google Chrome browser, uses QUIC already. Facebook claims 75% of their traffic (for the app?) is via QUIC[1]

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QUIC

[1]: https://engineering.fb.com/2020/10/21/networking-traffic/how...