151–160 of 224 posts
Hiding CNN, MSNBC, NYT from all citizens would increase the mental health, and physical health, of all citizens A LOT.
It requires a very high amount of naiveness to think this could solve the issue. Only thing that will help is education of children, so that they understand their place in the world, to accept themselves, that the aesthetic standards provided in social networks are very high (but yet, as a central European my sensibility is a bit different than the one in other places -- I would suggest that this must be a stimulus t…
I doubt that the only thing that will help is education. Education cannot win over something where other, more educated people are putting full-time careers in psychological hijacking of children. A 12 year old doesn't stand a chance no matter how much they accept themselves. This stuff needs to be regulated like cigarettes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll give it another 5 years before social media is viewed on the same level as cigarettes. The best thing I've ever done for my mental health was deleting social media. I realize I'm not significant enough to argue of other people about my own life. As long as you're not harming anyone else you're free to do whatever you want. Social media says no you have to shape your entire life around what people you'll never me…
And now you hang out at HN which is totally different from social media. Where people never seek approval from the masses. Chastising other people as a concept does not exist on HN. HN, the not-social media, does not even have a concept of likes.
Call em what you want, but upvotes/downvotes are in the same sphere as likes. Being downvoted into oblivion has the same mental effect as no likes or dislikes on other platforms, despite not being a 1:1 algorithm (1 upvote on HN does not necessarily equate to +1 in your karma) and even if you're the only one that can see them.
It requires a very high amount of naiveness to think this could solve the issue. Only thing that will help is education of children, so that they understand their place in the world, to accept themselves, that the aesthetic standards provided in social networks are very high (but yet, as a central European my sensibility is a bit different than the one in other places -- I would suggest that this must be a stimulus t…
I suspect many of the so called 'influencer' accounts buy likes and followers. A quick Google for 'buy instagram followers' leads you down a rabbithole of merchants willing to sell you followers and likes. The thing to notice is: when you've gained traction and are over 10,000 followers, the followers that you do buy, become un-noticeable, because there's so much noise on the platform (no-one notices).
This is why new accounts that suddenly have 1000 followers in 7 days is a red flag.
Why is there a total upvote count for users? I think it makes me focus excessively on social status -- after all, it's right next to my name. What would you think about removing it?
Dang, Why is there a total upvote count for users? I think it makes me focus excessively on social status -- after all, it's right next to my name. What would you think about removing it?
For what little that's worth.
It requires a very high amount of naiveness to think this could solve the issue. Only thing that will help is education of children, so that they understand their place in the world, to accept themselves, that the aesthetic standards provided in social networks are very high (but yet, as a central European my sensibility is a bit different than the one in other places -- I would suggest that this must be a stimulus t…
> that random appreciation in terms of "likes" is not a sensible measure of how much a person is worth I suspect many of the so called 'influencer' accounts buy likes and followers. A quick Google for 'buy instagram followers' leads you down a rabbithole of merchants willing to sell you followers and likes. The thing to notice is: when you've gained traction and are over 10,000 followers, the followers that you do bu…
An entire cottage industry exists of boutique firms that specialize in creating bullshit content for influencers. You can see it in spades when you look at "Tagged" photos, and see fan accounts for people with 10k followers with video and image collages. There's also the big "agencies" that rep larger influencers that practice the same tactics, maybe with just a little more finesse.
It requires a very high amount of naiveness to think this could solve the issue. Only thing that will help is education of children, so that they understand their place in the world, to accept themselves, that the aesthetic standards provided in social networks are very high (but yet, as a central European my sensibility is a bit different than the one in other places -- I would suggest that this must be a stimulus t…
I've noticed anecdotally that in the US, most of the de-badged cars are the low end models -- people don't want to be known as driving the cheapest end of the range. In Northern Europe, the de-badged cars are generally the highest end models. Wonder if there's a deeper learning to be found there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And now you hang out at HN which is totally different from social media. Where people never seek approval from the masses. Chastising other people as a concept does not exist on HN. HN, the not-social media, does not even have a concept of likes.
I think HN is actually worse, as the "approval" you get here is ostensibly from peers and folks that one may think are "just like them". It's easy to brush off not being approved by random Karen's on Facebook but far harder to accept PG or someone like him calling you a loser...
Most successful people tend to be a bit above that.
I enjoy HN since the discourse here tends to be fairly intelligent. I've already gained a great deal of very valuable information from this site