Live data from Hacker News

USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

theverge.com

421–430 of 498 posts

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#421

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It should be impossible for any set of non-damaged, non-defective, spec-compliant set of USB-C cables and peripherals to cause fires. Then there's the crap offered for sale on Alibaba which somebody will resell on Amazon and which will show up on a checkout rack at the gas station. USB-C has very tight tolerances and unusual material requirements. Dirt or water can create a conductive path all too easily with USB-C p…

Yeah but there will always be crap for Alibaba for anything you can think of. The solution would be banning charging altogether and adopt only proprietary standards.

You must be joking.

We've gone down that route before or is your memory fuzzy? When every single god damned device needed it's own special overengineered crap to charge?

But then again you might be old and rich enough to not care about it.

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#422

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I learned this recently: > If you receive a shock, if can affect the rhythm of your heart and cause problems later. We’re taught to go and get an ECG after receiving a shock. Like jump in the car and go to the doctor or hospital, and have someone else drive you. If you’ve received a shock - go get checked out. -jaidan https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27259589

yup, always work around high voltages with your left hand (the one closes to your heart) in your pocket, to discourage unwanted currents from passing through the heart

The main reason being that you don't want to be working with both hands, since then current can travel in one and out the other, directly across your chest.

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#423
Am I the only one who feels like it’s a bit late for high powered USB-C when Apple’s M1 is putting the squeeze on other manufacturers by showing how low power and high performance can go together?

I just got a screen that delivers just 40W over USB-C that keeps my M1 MBP fully charged and it’s been a revelation. Suddenly the fact that this machine’s charger is unique in a house full of other MacBooks is irrelevant.

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#424

I genuinely don’t understand how I’ve managed to be so lucky. That is, I absolutely do not disbelieve the many tales of woe I hear on HN (like the many in this thread) - but I’ve literally never put any thought into what cable I plug in to what device, and had no trouble that I can recall. It really had lived up to its hype for me so far. My USB-C devices are: a wireless charger, two MacBooks (one intel, one m1), a P…

Using USB-C for charging is not really the highest bar to clear. High res video would be, for example.

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#425

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or! We could go one step further, and change the connector to make sure that people use them correctly. Wouldn't that be clever!?

Better: add a color band to the connector. One line for low power, two for medium, three for high.

By the time the relevant committees have worked over that idea, there will be fifteen bands in colours that you need tetrachromic vision to differentiate between.

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah but there will always be crap for Alibaba for anything you can think of. The solution would be banning charging altogether and adopt only proprietary standards.

No, the solution for the US would be to refuse imports of any power device that lacks UL/CSA approval.

What about the 96% of human beings that buy their electronics outside of the USA?

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#428

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Voltage can't go up arbitrarily, but voltage can safely be increased to ~48V or so in most applications. After 48V, humans start to get shocked / hurt, so that's probably the reasonable limit. Car batteries in ICE cars are nominally 12v. Grab both terminals and tell me it doesn't hurt.

Ok, done. Many many many times. 12v can't exceed the resistance of human skin so it doesn't matter how much current capacity it has. You can hold onto those terminals all day. It's settled science. If you doubt it, tests of this are all over YouTube. It's just true. Now your tongue, perhaps...

So my cat doesn't have to worry?

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#429
post #11

I look forward to USB 4.1a Type C.2 Phase iii.b Gen 3E and the 482646282 different cable capability combinations that all plug in and have no distinction of those capabilities whatsoever. I also look forward to all the necessary and helpful posts telling me how the identical ports on my laptop are in fact diffferent despite their identical appearance. But at least everything uses the same plug, so that’s nice.

if only we could go back in time and warn ourselves about usb type-c. the future seemed so bright

Re: USB-C is about to go from 100W to 240W, enough to power beefier laptops

#430

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah but there will always be crap for Alibaba for anything you can think of. The solution would be banning charging altogether and adopt only proprietary standards.

You must be joking. We've gone down that route before or is your memory fuzzy? When every single god damned device needed it's own special overengineered crap to charge? But then again you might be old and rich enough to not care about it.

Don’t be a dick
Post reply on HN