Earlier quoted context omitted.
You failed to mention the times the US was on the right side of history. Most importantly, it defeated the USSR, which was, as Ronald Reagan correctly pointed out, an evil empire.
> it defeated the USSR Very arguably: no, it didn't. The USSR defeated itself. It overspent and was rife with corruption. They don't call it "the collapse of the USSR" for no reason. It couldn't maintain its own weight and fell in on itself.
Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
441–450 of 624 posts
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
Eh, my relatives are South Vietnamese, Vietcong was basically mafia and when communists won, they were horrible to the South. Not saying Diem government was that good, especially in their last months their anti-buddhist paranoia made them insane; but yeah communists were bad against the buddhists too once they came into power. But yeah Agent Orange and napalm were horrible. There is no debate about that.
Sorry that this got downvoted. Large numbers of Vietnamese refugees fled Vietnam after the North's victory.[1] Arbitrary arrest and torture remains widespread in Vietnam according to Amnesty International. These were incredibly interesting and inspiring pictures and it's a shame to see the top comment hijacked by juvenile America-baaad-ism. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnamese_boat_people
There are political prisoners, but it’s not random and widespread.
Coincidentally, Vietnamese communist government nowadays tries to be Best Friend with USA.
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#443The US is repeatedly on the wrong side of history. And they cannot even face that. Red scare. Supporting neo-liberal-to-fascist govts. Yelling democracy but then killing democratically chosen representatives when they do not "suit de US likings". Bitching about some "meddling" in their election when the history is full of US meddling in democratic process of other nations. Giving "foreign aid" to apartheid regimes. U…
But for a contrarian view on the “US Bad” narrative, check out a book called The Accidental Superpower
Here’s a good summary of the book: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review-the-a...
It presents an interesting case that the relative peace of modern society is entirely due to US military over-investment brought on by the Cold War—which allows for uninterrupted global supply chains, safe global trade, and enforces the intertwining of economic interests through global markets.
Absent the US existing, the world doesn’t suddenly become a utopia of people living happily ever after. Humans don’t have a great track record of being nice to each other. Unfortunately the alternative options to US power don’t look all that great.
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#444I saw a French movie about a French soldier in Vietnam set in 1945 I was also in France at the time when viewing the movie, it was very surreal in so many ways to be empathizing for a protagonist on one of the enemy sides - from an American perspective as I am an American. But I had never seen anything depicted about that war decades before the US got involved. I had never seen a war movie produced outside of Hollywo…
There are some depictions of the French occupation of Vietnam in the beginning of "We Were Soldiers".
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#445Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#446The US is repeatedly on the wrong side of history. And they cannot even face that. Red scare. Supporting neo-liberal-to-fascist govts. Yelling democracy but then killing democratically chosen representatives when they do not "suit de US likings". Bitching about some "meddling" in their election when the history is full of US meddling in democratic process of other nations. Giving "foreign aid" to apartheid regimes. U…
And the world is not perfect, but for whatever it's worth. I think the US does and did a fine job.
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#447The US is repeatedly on the wrong side of history. And they cannot even face that. Red scare. Supporting neo-liberal-to-fascist govts. Yelling democracy but then killing democratically chosen representatives when they do not "suit de US likings". Bitching about some "meddling" in their election when the history is full of US meddling in democratic process of other nations. Giving "foreign aid" to apartheid regimes. U…
You failed to mention the times the US was on the right side of history. Most importantly, it defeated the USSR, which was, as Ronald Reagan correctly pointed out, an evil empire.
I just hurt my eyes from rolling them _so hard._
The USSR collapsed because it was a wildly inefficient system that was unable to provide goods and services to its people.
In order to believe your wild statement you have to believe a lot of huge implausibilities, like the idea that the USSR would not have spent money on their military if not for the Americans, which would literally make them the ONLY empire in history to do that.
Particularly hard to believe is the idea that if Reagan hadn't spent trillions on thoroughly useless weapons, the USSR would have magically flourished.
> Ronald Reagan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals
Americans just love their wildly incompetent and corrupt Presidents, don't they?
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#448Earlier quoted context omitted.
You failed to mention the times the US was on the right side of history. Most importantly, it defeated the USSR, which was, as Ronald Reagan correctly pointed out, an evil empire.
> it defeated the USSR Very arguably: no, it didn't. The USSR defeated itself. It overspent and was rife with corruption. They don't call it "the collapse of the USSR" for no reason. It couldn't maintain its own weight and fell in on itself.
The USSR didn't really "overspend" though. The amount of money it was spending on the military was wildly exaggerated by the CIA and other people who wanted more budget.
The issue was the centrally planned economy and the monthly plans where factories would be effective for one week a month and spend the other three turning raw materials into garbage.
In the end, the USSR was simply unable to deliver sufficient goods and services to its citizens.
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#449My ex-wife Grandmother had spent over 10 years (1964-1975) in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia as a reporter on the Vietnamese side during the Vietnam War and consecutive conflicts (Vietnamese intervention in Cambodia 1978). She was the first European to walk all length of Ho Chi Minh trail, lived in Saigon undercover during American occupation and wrote couple of books about the Vietnam Wars. She was telling a lot of stor…
Ah yes, yet another crazy Republican idea I had forgotten about, that there are still POWs being kept in secret camps in Vietnam.
Vietnam has opened their entire country to Americans to inspect, including Republican politicos, and yet America still tells this evil lie.
Re: Vietnam War images from the North Vietnamese side
#450Earlier quoted context omitted.
You failed to mention the times the US was on the right side of history. Most importantly, it defeated the USSR, which was, as Ronald Reagan correctly pointed out, an evil empire.
> Most importantly, it defeated the USSR I just hurt my eyes from rolling them _so hard._ The USSR collapsed because it was a wildly inefficient system that was unable to provide goods and services to its people. In order to believe your wild statement you have to believe a lot of huge implausibilities, like the idea that the USSR would not have spent money on their military if not for the Americans, which would lite…
I'm not arguing either for or against Reagan. I merely point out that he was right about the USSR.