Live data from Hacker News

Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

reuters.com

21–30 of 207 posts

Re: Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

#21
post #7

> Pilot: Again, this recommendation to divert to Minsk where did it come from? Where did it come from? Company? Did it come from departure airport authorities or arrival airport authorities? Is it usual for a pilot to ask for all this information? From a "casual reader" perspective, it looks like the pilot really did not want to divert, but this might just be my reading.

Not an airline pilot, but I am a private pilot.

Yes, I think it's normal to ask for more information while complying with instructions from ATC, [their] workload permitting. And you're required to comply with ATC instructions except in an emergency (doesn't necessarily have to be declared).

Re: Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

#23
post #7

> Pilot: Again, this recommendation to divert to Minsk where did it come from? Where did it come from? Company? Did it come from departure airport authorities or arrival airport authorities? Is it usual for a pilot to ask for all this information? From a "casual reader" perspective, it looks like the pilot really did not want to divert, but this might just be my reading.

If you're Russian? I would. No point in trusting any authority to be doing the right thing over there.

Re: Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

#24
post #18
post #7

> Pilot: Again, this recommendation to divert to Minsk where did it come from? Where did it come from? Company? Did it come from departure airport authorities or arrival airport authorities? Is it usual for a pilot to ask for all this information? From a "casual reader" perspective, it looks like the pilot really did not want to divert, but this might just be my reading.

If you were told there is a bomb on board your plane, would you not be the slightest bit interested in some additional information about where that intelligence has come from? I suspect airlines get hoax bomb threats on a regular basis so pilots are keen to understand the source and veracity of the threats.

[deleted]

Re: Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

#27
post #14
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> pilot knew something was off The whole "there's a bomb that can be detonated over Vilnius" so you have to divert to an airport further away, where I am speaking from" thing sounds like a B-movie plot.

At the point they diverted they could have also flown to Kaunas (a Ryanair base) if the concern was to avoid flying over Vilnius. That would also have been closer than Minsk.

I don't think the pilot was aware of any reason not to fly to Minsk at the time.

Re: Transcript of controller telling plane to land in Minsk

#30
post #7

> Pilot: Again, this recommendation to divert to Minsk where did it come from? Where did it come from? Company? Did it come from departure airport authorities or arrival airport authorities? Is it usual for a pilot to ask for all this information? From a "casual reader" perspective, it looks like the pilot really did not want to divert, but this might just be my reading.

I haven't had time to follow this episode to the level of detail I normally would. I would expect a number of factors at play around hesitancy, not limited to:

* Expectation of contact on other frequencies.

* Minsk directly stating bomb on board with connection to Vilnius (may not be protocol)

* Airport staff sent email (again, is this correct protocol?)

* Message being that activation is over Vilnius (pilot may have accepted that, but also accepted that they had sufficient fuel to hold)

* Pilot considering bomb may be activated by altitude (hence wanting to hold versus make immediate landing in place with relatively poor facilities)

* Lack of NATO or other western agency involvement. Again, this is a sudden and extremely difficult situation, but pilot probably knows they fuel to make a more considered decision on actions.

I look forward to learning more from this incident. You should be able to trust any controller is acting in good faith as a civilian navigator, but that's clearly not the case.

Post reply on HN