Live data from Hacker News

What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

brookings.edu

91–100 of 188 posts

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#91

I have a conspiracy theory that there are far more rich people than we are lead to believe, also that most of us are just working to prop them up and keep them rich.

You’ll never see rich people argue for a wealth tax, but they sure as hell will parade demanding that we raise taxes on income of the service class.

If we taxed expenditure, rather than revenue, they wouldn't have a chance to hide a damn thing.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#92
post #88
post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's factually incorrect. It's easy to make a list of rich people specifically saying tax the rich more. Leaving that aside, the 1% pay 38.5% of taxes, which seems quite fair as is. We already tax the rich quite heavily. I'd rather the focus be on compliance. Close the loopholes and catch the tax evaders. Wealth taxes, if you look at examples elsewhere both present and historically, are hard to do well. I worry the…

> Leaving that aside, the 1% pay 38.5% of taxes, which seems quite fair as is. We already tax the rich quite heavily. Given the fact the top 1% hold 43% of the global wealth I think they aren't paying their fair share... There is no need for someone to have 100 billion dollars they an struggle by with 10 billion easy enough .. or even 1 billion https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/top-1-percent-of-household...

so what's fair? 50%? 60? who decides? when does it stop?

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#93

If the IRS knows how much money I owe why dont they just send me a bill?

You proceed from a fallacy. The IRS doesn't know how much tax you owe because Congress has created a massively complex system that includes using deductions to incentivize certain types of behavior, as well as using the tax system as a mechanism to deliver means-tested benefits.

Yeah. For example, one year I bought double-pane windows for my house, which were eligible for a tax deduction (on the grounds of promoting energy conservation). Either I have to tell the IRS that I bought those windows, or the IRS has to know that I bought windows. The second option is too close to dystopian nightmares for my taste.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you doubled or tripled the number of cops in LA, would they solve more difficult crimes in the monied and lawyered Hollywood Hills? Or would they go after more petty crime in South Central, where it’s easy to get a conviction?

that's a poor comparison. The IRS are not cops, and the monied and lawyered do not commit petty crime at a high level whereas they do commit tax evasion at a much higher level.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRS_Criminal_Investigation

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#95

If the IRS knows how much money I owe why dont they just send me a bill?

In part, they know a bunch of stuff but not everything, so they want to see if you lie about the stuff they DO know about because that suggests you are also lying about stuff they don’t know about.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#96

If the IRS knows how much money I owe why dont they just send me a bill?

You proceed from a fallacy. The IRS doesn't know how much tax you owe because Congress has created a massively complex system that includes using deductions to incentivize certain types of behavior, as well as using the tax system as a mechanism to deliver means-tested benefits.

90% of US taxpayers used the standard deduction in 2018, up from 70% in previous years.

This has been a major topic of discussion in tax circles for decades, the vast majority of Americans do not benefit from deductions and the federal government's direct knowledge of your income is essentially identical to your own (because of mandatory reporting from employers, banks & other financial service entities).

Specific deductions are written by and for high income individuals, and supported by lobbying from the tax industry which wouldn't exist without them, but they're not used by the vast majority of Americans, especially with raised SALT limits and doubled standard deduction.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You proceed from a fallacy. The IRS doesn't know how much tax you owe because Congress has created a massively complex system that includes using deductions to incentivize certain types of behavior, as well as using the tax system as a mechanism to deliver means-tested benefits.

You assume everyone itemizes deductions. There is a thing called the "standard deduction" which renders your point moot for the people using it which I suspect has a lot of overlap with the people who would like the IRS to do the calculation.

No; I am not assuming that. The standard deduction does cover a lot of people; but a lot of the people that it covers end up filling out other forms as part of their returns for tax credits.

For example, the Earned Income Tax Credit is a means-tested benefit program that's delivered through the tax system. This is not a niche program - 25 million families benefit from it.

It requires filers to identify how many qualifying children they have, which in turns depends on things like the educational status (is this child in school, college, are they a full-time student) and residency (child must generally live with you, but with exceptions for overseas military service, etc).

In cases where multiple filers can claim a qualifying child (e.g. cohabiting single filers), you're required to make an election as to which return will claim the qualifying child.

The EITC also encourages reporting of informal income (because it's only available to people who earned an income) which might not be on a W-2 / 1099, e.g. baby sitting, to qualify.

None of that stuff is known to the IRS from W-2s, 1099s etc. and they are dependent on the filer to provide it every year, especially as circumstances change; and filers are strongly incentivized to provide it as the credit is refundable.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#98
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You proceed from a fallacy. The IRS doesn't know how much tax you owe because Congress has created a massively complex system that includes using deductions to incentivize certain types of behavior, as well as using the tax system as a mechanism to deliver means-tested benefits.

90% of US taxpayers used the standard deduction in 2018, up from 70% in previous years. This has been a major topic of discussion in tax circles for decades, the vast majority of Americans do not benefit from deductions and the federal government's direct knowledge of your income is essentially identical to your own (because of mandatory reporting from employers, banks & other financial service entities). Specific de…

Refer to my response to another comment below; it is absolutely wrong to assume "this person takes a standard deduction so they haven't any tax forms to fill".

And this is not just limited to the Earned Income Tax Credit.

There are also Child Credits, Child and Dependent Care Credits, Adoption Credits, Residential Energy Credits (for those who got solar), Low-Income Housing Credits (for low-income home owners), American Opportunity Tax Credits (for those with low/middle incomes paying college expenses) ... and all of these are relevant to non-itemizers.

P.S. there are also above-the-line deductions available which reduce your AGI even if you take the standard deduction - an important one being the one for Student Loan Interest.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#99
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

interesting. what makes you think so?

If you doubled or tripled the number of cops in LA, would they solve more difficult crimes in the monied and lawyered Hollywood Hills? Or would they go after more petty crime in South Central, where it’s easy to get a conviction?

ok, so where I from tax fraud is also known as tax sin Steuersünde. it's not like an obstacle that you evade or a game where you dodge the ball. it's fraud and a crime, and not a game to win.

consequentially the German IRS has bought data from Swiss and Liechtenstein tax haven whistleblowers. several times so. and to the amazement and applause of the public, very prominent figures went to jail. like soccer legend Uli Hoeneß.

the corresponding Wikipedia article is surprisingly not available in English yet:

https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steuers%C3%BCnder-CD

long story short: if you, the American people, elect representatives who want a fair system, you will get a fair system.

of course IRS will go after tax fraud at scale if you make them do that.

Re: What lies beneath: Evidence from leaked account data on offshore banking use

#100
post #92
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Leaving that aside, the 1% pay 38.5% of taxes, which seems quite fair as is. We already tax the rich quite heavily. Given the fact the top 1% hold 43% of the global wealth I think they aren't paying their fair share... There is no need for someone to have 100 billion dollars they an struggle by with 10 billion easy enough .. or even 1 billion https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/top-1-percent-of-household...

so what's fair? 50%? 60? who decides? when does it stop?

we should look at the big picture not just the percentages that those people are taxed at the end. Because in many cases the leading question is: How come they earn so much more than every one else? Is it through sheer talent and grit or is there something else going on? Inheritance, structures that benefit those with capital over those who labor, connections with the right people etc. etc. And after analyzing all that coming back to the question whether someone should earn 10.000 as much as another person who works the same hours? Should someone earn billions in a year and then use it for moon shots like going to mars? Is that what the society needs or can afford right now? Maybe. But for as long as there are people who work 40 hours a week and cannot afford a healthy life (e.g. having no trouble coming up with emergency money, dont have to commute 2h just to get to their minimum wage job etc.), there certainly is a structural problem going on. This structural problem can only be solved if - and that's the most important point - wealth is shared more equally. Meaning taxation (and all the structures that lead to income) has to take more from those who earn more and give to those who cannot give more. Well, that's if we want to live in a social society, if not forget what I said.
Post reply on HN