Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
1–10 of 110 posts
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#2Course not, that would annoy Belarus, which might lead to Ryanair losing profit
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#3Here is a new statement published 45 minutes ago: https://twitter.com/RyanairPress/status/1396767221058359299
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#4Here is a new statement published 45 minutes ago: https://twitter.com/RyanairPress/status/1396767221058359299
[deleted]
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#5The main purpose of that statement (as always with Ryanair) was to state it was outside of their control and therefore they will auto-reject any claims for delay compensation, regardless of legality.
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#6Here is a new statement published 45 minutes ago: https://twitter.com/RyanairPress/status/1396767221058359299
Are they reading HN?
And just updated Ryanair's statement still does not include info about two "arrested" (kidnapped!) passengers of FR4978 flight in Minsk...
JFTR, Originally title of actual thread on HN was: “Ryanair’s statement on FR4978 does not include info about arrested passengers”[0]
[0] https://twitter.com/hn_frontpage/status/1396775444071002113
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#7Others on twitter have pointed out: the pilot's job is to follow instructions from ATC.
e.g. https://twitter.com/DavideLeDingue/status/139653511684805837...
The blame of this debacle does not lie with RyanAir, notwithstanding the way that their press release reads like "then Mrs Lincoln was slightly delayed at the theatre."
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#8Here is a new statement published 45 minutes ago: https://twitter.com/RyanairPress/status/1396767221058359299
Are they reading HN? And just updated Ryanair's statement still does not include info about two "arrested" (kidnapped!) passengers of FR4978 flight in Minsk... JFTR, Originally title of actual thread on HN was: “Ryanair’s statement on FR4978 does not include info about arrested passengers” [0] [0] https://twitter.com/hn_frontpage/status/1396775444071002113
Do you seriously think HN is the only place this is being discussed? They could’ve read it from anywhere.
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are they reading HN? And just updated Ryanair's statement still does not include info about two "arrested" (kidnapped!) passengers of FR4978 flight in Minsk... JFTR, Originally title of actual thread on HN was: “Ryanair’s statement on FR4978 does not include info about arrested passengers” [0] [0] https://twitter.com/hn_frontpage/status/1396775444071002113
Do you seriously think HN is the only place this is being discussed? They could’ve read it from anywhere.
Of course they may be triggered by my tweet, which I posted just before started actual HN thread.[0]
Re: Ryanair’s statement on diversion to Minsk Airport
#10I understand the anger against Ryanair aloofness and its dictatorship compliance, but I think it's diverting energy from the real culprits, which are the kidnappers and their boss.