Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
1–10 of 38 posts
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#2https://timharford.com/2021/05/cautionary-tales-fritterin-aw...
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#3So people just yelled louder or yelled repeatedly to get things across with better reliability. And when channel capacity was exceeded with everyone yelling too much, no one knew it had exceeded and lot of energy and time was wasted with increasing errors in the system.
Doesn't that feel like a repeat with whats happening in social media and news media these days? Or is it just different things.
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#4From what I understand, before Shannon showed up no one knew how to calculate the Channel Capacity of a medium and how to deal with noise in the medium. So people just yelled louder or yelled repeatedly to get things across with better reliability. And when channel capacity was exceeded with everyone yelling too much, no one knew it had exceeded and lot of energy and time was wasted with increasing errors in the syst…
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#5From what I understand, before Shannon showed up no one knew how to calculate the Channel Capacity of a medium and how to deal with noise in the medium. So people just yelled louder or yelled repeatedly to get things across with better reliability. And when channel capacity was exceeded with everyone yelling too much, no one knew it had exceeded and lot of energy and time was wasted with increasing errors in the syst…
Maybe. It can feel like this, but applying mathematical models to social phenomena is tricky. You have to map formal parameters to fuzzy, poorly understood factors. How do you define, precisely, what is a "channel" on a social network? What is "signal", and what is "noise"? People can and do prove anything by using slightly different (or inconsistent) definitions here, getting the numbers to line up just like they want them to.
My understanding is that a better way to approach such mapping would be to shove in probability distributions in place of hard-to-map exact parameters - abstracting away choices and measurements lets you see the wider context here. This pushes the problem to defining the appropriate distributions, but I think that's more tamper-proof. Unfortunately, the results may come out next to useless - e.g. probability distributions so wide you could sail a carrier strike group through them.
I'd love to know what's considered the correct, robust approach to such problems.
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#6Funny timing. Tim Harford's Cautionary Tales podcast had an episode about Shannon. He sounds like a fun guy to have been around. https://timharford.com/2021/05/cautionary-tales-fritterin-aw...
The podcast was great! I would think that many on HN would find it interesting.
Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#7Re: Claude Shannon: Tinkerer, Prankster, and Father of Information Theory (2016)
#8Funny timing. Tim Harford's Cautionary Tales podcast had an episode about Shannon. He sounds like a fun guy to have been around. https://timharford.com/2021/05/cautionary-tales-fritterin-aw...
The timing is a little less funny if you know that I listened to the podcast shortly before finding the IEEE article. The podcast was great! I would think that many on HN would find it interesting.
I'd never heard of him, and that's embarrassing, but he probably prefers it that way :-).