An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
1–10 of 254 posts
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#2Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#3Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#4I'm thinking of using Postgres for a project, but a DBA friend told me operationally it's more challenging than MySQL. Unfortunately, he can't elaborate. Does anyone have real work experience? Or is it based on outdated "PG must manually vacuum frequently"?
Postgres by itself doesn't have a great horitzontal scaling strategy as of now I think. You need Citus or somt like that on top, maybe your friend was referencing that?
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#5Do any other entrenched software projects come to mind? The only thing comparable I can think of are Git and Linux.
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#6I'm thinking of using Postgres for a project, but a DBA friend told me operationally it's more challenging than MySQL. Unfortunately, he can't elaborate. Does anyone have real work experience? Or is it based on outdated "PG must manually vacuum frequently"?
nowadays postgres in the cloud does all of this for you.
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#7Postgres is one of those pieces of software that’s so much better than anything else, it’s really incredible. I wonder if it’s even possible for competitors to catch up at this point - there’s not a lot of room for improvement in architecture of relational databases any more. I’m starting to think that Postgres is going to be with us for decades maybe even centuries. Do any other entrenched software projects come to…
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#8I'm thinking of using Postgres for a project, but a DBA friend told me operationally it's more challenging than MySQL. Unfortunately, he can't elaborate. Does anyone have real work experience? Or is it based on outdated "PG must manually vacuum frequently"?
And don't take my word for it, see for yourself here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_relational_datab...
And MySQL is an Oracle product these days, go with MariaDB instead as this one is a MySQL fork made by the original papa of MySQL.
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#9I'm thinking of using Postgres for a project, but a DBA friend told me operationally it's more challenging than MySQL. Unfortunately, he can't elaborate. Does anyone have real work experience? Or is it based on outdated "PG must manually vacuum frequently"?
[1,2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/routine-vacuuming.html https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/planner-stats.html
The main issue we get is the 1 connection = 1 process issue although there are ways to mitigate that (namely pgbouncer).
Re: An early look at Postgres 14: Performance and monitoring Improvements
#10Postgres is one of those pieces of software that’s so much better than anything else, it’s really incredible. I wonder if it’s even possible for competitors to catch up at this point - there’s not a lot of room for improvement in architecture of relational databases any more. I’m starting to think that Postgres is going to be with us for decades maybe even centuries. Do any other entrenched software projects come to…
Excel for business spreadsheets.
Java for enterprise server software.