Live data from Hacker News

Citizen app sparked a $30k manhunt for the wrong guy

vox.com

11–20 of 24 posts

Re: Citizen app sparked a $30k manhunt for the wrong guy

#13
post #11

What’s the difference between this and Twitter mobs?

Probably not much, but the victim would have a better chance suing Citizen than Twitter. Twitter polices it’s platform, but Section 230 provides a good shield for them against user content. Citizen, OTOH, isn’t protected by Section 230 because the company itself issued the notification.

Disclaimer: IANAL

Re: Citizen app sparked a $30k manhunt for the wrong guy

#15
post #11

What’s the difference between this and Twitter mobs?

Being location specific provides a veneer of legitimacy.

I would come from a different angle. Twitter is worse because the target is way more abstract, removed, so the Twitter vigilantes are almost acting on a conceptual plane and don’t care about real life implications.

Re: Citizen app sparked a $30k manhunt for the wrong guy

#17
post #14
post #11

What’s the difference between this and Twitter mobs?

Twitter mobs send words to famous/semi-famous people they have never met. This on the other hand looks more like a bounty board for self-appointed neighborhood sheriffs.

Twitter trolls act like reeves themselves looking for the people they have an axe to grind with and ruining lives just the same.

Re: Citizen app sparked a $30k manhunt for the wrong guy

#19
post #7

Someone needs to sue these people into bankruptcy.

Is it illegal to call someone an arson suspect ? I imagine that wrongly calling someone an arsonist would be libel/slander, but I wonder if things change when you include the word suspect .

While it's not illegal to call someone a suspect, putting a bounty on someone's head might be. You're essentially endangering someone's life. If the person was harmed, they could easily win a massive lawsuit.
Post reply on HN