/s, if it wasn't obvious. Don't we have laws that protect children already?
How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
121–130 of 165 posts
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
GDPR is only tractable because 90% of companies don't implement it. In Germany thousands of companies illegally use Mailchimp for example.
I am curious what about Mailchimp make them illegal to use ? On the face of it they seem to have support for the required stuff: https://mailchimp.com/gdpr/
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was also curious, so I found this: https://edpb.europa.eu/news/national-news/2021/bavarian-dpa-... The core: ... transfers of personal data to the U.S.- were not lawful. So the problem is that an US company cannot be GDPR compliant, because that conflicts with US law. Which sucks for mailchimp but makes sense.
A US company can be compliant. They just have to host EU user data in the EU.
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#124Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the same with GDPR. When I worked for a large enterprise, we had a legal/compliance team of dozens of people and a huge outsourced legal budget. When I worked in the startup of my wife, it was me implementing GDPR compliance.
I'm not sure I understand. A large company has a whole team and a small start-up has one person assign the task? That sounds entirely reasonable.
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the same with GDPR. When I worked for a large enterprise, we had a legal/compliance team of dozens of people and a huge outsourced legal budget. When I worked in the startup of my wife, it was me implementing GDPR compliance.
But at least GDPR /is/ tractable to implement at small scale. Whereas for the OSB: if you run a smallish but popular chat/blog/forum/etc service, there literally isn’t a solution for moderation which isn’t fiendishly expensive, privacy invasive, or both. The legislation has clearly been dreamt up by folks saying “ah ha! if we threaten the Facebook UK executive mangement team with jailtime unless they do better at fil…
Isn’t that exactly what the GDPR did? I know I pulled my apps for fear of fines and jailtime that might lead to the first country Im not allowed into.
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#126Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like how you, with actual concrete real-world experiences you are sharing, are being downvoted by silent armchair enthusiasts who mostly just like GDPR because they get the sense that it’s vaguely bad for Facebook.
As a private citizen I like GDPR - even if Facebook will find ways around it (but I do not really care, I've left Facebook many years ago because of privacy concerns). As someone who implemented it in several companies, I don't like it because it hits smaller companies much harder than bigger ones, and because it tries to be technology agnostic it is quite fuzzy, compate to something like SOX or PCIDSS (which I also…
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the same with GDPR. When I worked for a large enterprise, we had a legal/compliance team of dozens of people and a huge outsourced legal budget. When I worked in the startup of my wife, it was me implementing GDPR compliance.
I'm not sure I understand. A large company has a whole team and a small start-up has one person assign the task? That sounds entirely reasonable.
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#128> Whilst we sympathise with the government’s desire to show action in this space and to do something about children’s safety (everyone’s safety really), we cannot possibly agree with the methods. Respectfully, stop sympathising with authoritarians who want to take away your freedom. They are not good people. Good people aren't nosey. Good people don't deprive others of liberty. Neither do they class a whole group (In…
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#129Earlier quoted context omitted.
But at least GDPR /is/ tractable to implement at small scale. Whereas for the OSB: if you run a smallish but popular chat/blog/forum/etc service, there literally isn’t a solution for moderation which isn’t fiendishly expensive, privacy invasive, or both. The legislation has clearly been dreamt up by folks saying “ah ha! if we threaten the Facebook UK executive mangement team with jailtime unless they do better at fil…
> The legislation has clearly been dreamt up by folks saying “ah ha! if we threaten the Facebook UK executive mangement team with jailtime unless they do better at filtering self-harm/CSAM/terrorism/etc then they will obviously get their house in order!”. Whereas in practice they crush their own UK-based startups instead. So frustrating. Isn’t that exactly what the GDPR did? I know I pulled my apps for fear of fines…
Re: How the UK's online safety bill threatens Matrix
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
The cameras tracking everything everywhere in UK would say that it's long been an authoritarian country. Authoritarianism is a sliding scale. From what I can gather, lots of humans that have any political pull at all tend to be authoritarian (against the kinds of people they don't like, of course).
Most cameras in the UK (I think around 95% even) are private. Not sure why you think the UK is an authoritarian regime. Check any ranking and it is one of the freest countries out there (Heritage Ranking, for example: https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking )