Live data from Hacker News

Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

tinyprojects.dev

71–80 of 148 posts

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

wooosh

Ha, I see it now. Too dry and too early (in the morning)

The funny thing is that a couple of comments up 2 sibling comments basically gave the exact same answer, but one in jest and one seriously. The cryptosphere really is beyond parody

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They have ~2500 emails, no socials and seemingly only a few backlinks to startup listing websites. That does not seem worth 10k to me. What do you think?

if it's making $350/month, that's $12.6k for 3 years. I think a general rule of thumb for website valuations is 3 years of ARR so seems about right. That's assuming that the website will never grow and will never has any other possible income source.

Never grow? It will shrink. The buyer got robbed. Churn is one the numbers investors watch like a hawk in a SaaS, and I can’t imagine this service retaining more than 30% of their users over several months.

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#73
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is the same advice you hear for any other project - solve a problem. The projects that work are the ones that solve people's problems. The ones that fail are the ones that try to create solutions for problems people do not have.

To add to this, advice from people successful in this area really recommend solving a problem *you* have and avoid trying to solve problems you know exist but aren't a problem for you.

This is good advice. Problems you have yourself you understand better and have probably already had some thoughts on how to solve them. Even idle thoughts in the past can be really handy when it comes time to think deeper about solving it in code.

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#75

Buyer: I think I could come up to maybe $7500 but that’s about it. .. then later: Buyer: Ok at $10,500 we have a deal. I've sold a few projects in my time, but this conversation makes me think I should really look at having an agent represent me in future. The whole "I can only offer $7500" but then that turned into a $10500 sale just goes over my head - the communications skills needed are next level, and I've read…

On the flip side, an agent is motivated to close the deal not necessarily get the highest price. If the agent gets 10% cut, they get $750 or $1050. Is $300 worth potentially souring the deal?

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#76
post #22

> Giving your project to a stranger on the internet is risky, so we used escrow.com to make the transfer. I sold a website on Flippa once. The buyer put the money on Escrow.com, I transferred everything over, and they went AWOL. What I found out is that there is no straightforward way to obtain the funds when it happens. Apparently there is no way at all except via the court system. Which would mean the only real pro…

escrow.com is a licensed escrow operator. This is how it works, they don't get to just decide the outcome or they'll get shutdown during their audits. This is a good thing in transacting on the internet.

Does escrow licensing not allow for a "transaction closed in 3 months or assets released to original owner" contracts?

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#77

I appreciate how open the dev is being and I like the article! But I have a moral annoyance towards username squatting, especially by folks who don’t actually participate in the network…

This is exactly why I end up making usernames non-unique in many of my online projects (such as learnawesome.org). It makes things more complex to implement, but at least nobody has to compromise on the online nicknames they want.

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#78
post #70

Buyer: I think I could come up to maybe $7500 but that’s about it. .. then later: Buyer: Ok at $10,500 we have a deal. I've sold a few projects in my time, but this conversation makes me think I should really look at having an agent represent me in future. The whole "I can only offer $7500" but then that turned into a $10500 sale just goes over my head - the communications skills needed are next level, and I've read…

In reality it's much easier. I've sold couple of my projects before via different mediums (one is through microacquire - the one OP mentioned, and one was through a connect), and the best way i found to go about it is to be ready to walk away from the deal. I know this is negotiations 101, but it's tough to put it in practice most of the time if one person wants a little bit more to see the transaction through. Surpr…

Another great way is to make sure there are multiple prospect buyers and have them bid against each other.

Re: Selling Tiny Internet Projects for Fun and Profit

#79
post #69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Which would mean the only real protection Escrow gives is against the buyer going bankrupt (or using false identity, I suppose). Well, the buyer is out of the money in any case, which is a pretty big protection.

No. The buyer got his assets. You are out of money.

The buyer as well. But the buyer technically has "paid" so they may not be as concerned with closing out the transaction. If only the assets could be held in escrow as well, then when both elements are held by the escrow group, they can release to the appropriate parties.
Post reply on HN