Live data from Hacker News

Anal oxygen administration may save lives

economist.com

131–140 of 169 posts

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#131
post #13

The rectum is an interesting place. You can apparently also absorb water there, if you are severely dehydrated and unable to hold anything down (eg seasick). All you need, the saying goes, is a funnel and a friend.. full disclosure: I've not tried that!

I’m sure a plastic water bottle and a few yoga poses will suffice, go for it!

Your anus is not actually just a hole you can just pour things into. It seals itself. A funnel is of the essence when trying to pour liquids into the rectal cavity.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Works for alcohol too; keyword "butt chug". Can result in alcohol poisoning if you dose too much.

Works for other drugs too, it's known as boofing.

Or "plugging" if we are talking about other drugs.

> The insertion or other voluntary introduction of foreign matter into the anus or vaginal cavity for the sole purpose of recreational misuse (or use) of said item/substance. Similar to butt chugging, with the exception of using non-liquidous matter instead of alcoholic beverages.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#133
post #65
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Let’s be realistic here - if you are requiring a tracheostomy and ventilator, or ECMO the you are severely unwell. Obviously. So why use these invasive procedures if a less invasive one could do the job with less risk? > A blood transfusion, or small risk of infection is the least of your worries at that point. Did you come straight from the 19th century or something? Hospital acquired infections kill hundreds of t…

Angry much? Calm yourself down. Clearly if anal oxygen proves to be safer and as effective then it will be adopted. No one is disputing that. My comment was regarding your expletive laden derision of devices which save hundreds of thousands of lives. And you seem to have missed the point. I did. It say hospital acquired infections are not prevalent or problematic. My point was that every decision in medicine s based…

> Clearly if anal oxygen proves to be safer and as effective then it will be adopted. No one is disputing that.

Could've fooled me with how dismissive you were.

> My point was that every decision in medicine s based on risk and benefit.

Then there should be no problem with highlighting the risks so people realise that alternatives are worth it not just as somehow inferior "second standard" as implied by the person I was replying to, but as equal or better solution.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#134
post #15
post #4

I wish paywalled articles were banned from HN. Just because I can bypass it does not mean it’s worth the effort.

Quality journalism needs to be paid, though paid how is an open question

Making people buy a subscription for every single newspaper on the planet is definitely not a working solution.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We're pouring liquids into our butts right? What's the friend for? Can't one do that on their own?

It's really easier with a friend, especially the reach-around part.

Your comment is hilarious. I had the same question. Thanks.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The idea of breathing one of these heavily oxygenated liquids has been around for a while and I believe even tested on live animals. I can’t remember if it was tested on humans. In theory it all works and has great benefits for breathing in high pressure environments. In reality I believe the issues encountered were: getting past the feeling of drowning at the beginning, needing very strong lungs for even normal brea…

> ...transitioning back to air being problematic. Yeah, this seems to be quite an obstacle, giving the fact how long it may take for lungs to fully expectorate the mucus after a bout of pneumonia.

In this case, this gas would be injected directly into the rectum, so you could switch back to lungs as soon as the lungs were clear (or run both simultaneously). At least, that's the theory.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#137
post #107

The latest season of The Expanse featured a character who had been exposed to vacuum revived by an injection of “hyperoxygenated blood” in the arm. This makes me think they just got the method of administration slightly wrong. In the future spaceship air locks will include a box of emergency oxygen suppositories.

Not at all. It is rather am extension of EMCO tech that exists today that can oxygenate blood externally before it is returned to the body.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#138
tl;dr: researchers discovered that pumping liquid perfluorocarbons, which can absorb large amounts of oxygen, directly into the anus of the tested mammals (not humans, yet) can help them survive even in low oxygen (or even completely deprived of oxygen, for 4 times longer) environments.

The idea is that this will enable a less invasive way of ventilation for oxygen-deprived patients (i.e., covid-19) than tracheal intubation. It's even possible a patient could be ventilated from (pardon) both ends simultaneously.

Re: Anal oxygen administration may save lives

#140
post #13

The rectum is an interesting place. You can apparently also absorb water there, if you are severely dehydrated and unable to hold anything down (eg seasick). All you need, the saying goes, is a funnel and a friend.. full disclosure: I've not tried that!

Sounds useful for Ebola patients. Dehydration is apparently the thing that kills you the fastest. However, it could be very hazardous to your (very loving) friend.
Post reply on HN