Live data from Hacker News

A URL Lengthener

aaa.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.com

251–260 of 313 posts

Re: A URL Lengthener

#251
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or when you Google something and copy a link straight from their search page. Novel-length URLs.

This is so frustrating, I just want the url, but NO, you can an escaped version of the URL embedded inside another escaped blob instead. Ditto with Facebook.

How would Microsoft, Google and Facebook otherwise be able to track when and what you click?! Think of the hit to their revenue!

Re: A URL Lengthener

#252
post #248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is so frustrating, I just want the url, but NO, you can an escaped version of the URL embedded inside another escaped blob instead. Ditto with Facebook.

How would Microsoft, Google and Facebook otherwise be able to track when and what you click?! Think of the hit to their revenue!

They can use onclick and leave the href attribute alone.

Re: A URL Lengthener

#253
post #239

Microsoft also provides a URL lengthener via "Advanced Outlook.com security for Office 365 subscribers". Thanks to them, any URL we send or receive by email at work turns into an unrecognizable monster. At least the links include comforting words like "safelinks" and "protection" so that everyone can feel safe and protected.

Or when you Google something and copy a link straight from their search page. Novel-length URLs.

Copying canonical PDF link from Google result on Android device is extremely frustrating because Chrome Android doesn't support to open PDF so it opens reader app. Anyone have solution?

Re: A URL Lengthener

#254
post #10
post #3

Love it. This is going in the toolbox along with http://shadyurl.com

Lol. I clicked this on my (managed) work laptop, and immediately got a Compliance warning popup. I don't know what I expected...

Ahhh, devSecOps. This guys banned lastpass.com or storage.googleapis.com because of "security" in company I justed to work.

Re: A URL Lengthener

#255

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ah yes. Checkbox Driven Development. AKA Monkey Paw Development, where you give exactly what was asked for; it remains surprisingly popular in the government and enterprise spaces.

Requirements are hard in dysfunctional organizations, or those with more stakeholders than capability and agility.

I wonder the extent to which those two specifications describe the exact same organizations.

Re: A URL Lengthener

#256

Earlier quoted context omitted.

howmanypeopleareinspacerightnow.com doesthemailruntoday.com Are the two I like.

I'm partial to penisland.net ... they make the best pens.

It’s usually a bad idea to add a hyphen in a domain name.

Unless your old domain was expertsexchange.com

Re: A URL Lengthener

#257
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would Microsoft, Google and Facebook otherwise be able to track when and what you click?! Think of the hit to their revenue!

They can use onclick and leave the href attribute alone.

But what to do about them JavaScript disabling varmints then?

Re: A URL Lengthener

#258
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How would Microsoft, Google and Facebook otherwise be able to track when and what you click?! Think of the hit to their revenue!

They can use onclick and leave the href attribute alone.

I'm sure this is something they have considered as their own analytics program uses onclick to track outbound traffic - I assume it's a mix of speed, reliability and the ability to track without javascript.

Plus, if it was done on OnClick there would definitely be an add-on to disable the tracking on all browsers.

Re: A URL Lengthener

#259
post #252

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can use onclick and leave the href attribute alone.

But what to do about them JavaScript disabling varmints then?

That’s what hyperlink auditing with the ping attribute is for:

https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/links.html#hyperlink-...

You put a `ping` attribute on a link, and when the user follows the link, the browser sends a request to the ping URL notifying it of the action.

Firefox disables it by default, which doesn’t seem like much of a privacy win considering JavaScript is enabled by default and can polyfill this functionality.

Post reply on HN