Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 123 posts

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#71
Employer wants as much done as possible ASAP. Physical & biological & social realities mean one person can be expected to produce 40 hours per week, 60 on occasion. There isn't an endless supply of quality knowledge workers, so (assuming the "80% movement" takes hold) filling that additional productivity expectation becomes difficult as businesses compete for a limited pool - more so as it's hard to fill a 20% gap when there's only "80%" or "100%" workers to fill it with (you don't get good knowledge workers part-time long-term).

Ergo (roughly speaking) you're asking employers to cut cumulative productivity 20%, and thus revenue/profits 20% for ... what? while other employers race forward with "100%" employees, producing 25% more per week.

40-50 hour weeks seems about the limit before employee productivity & availability ends. Claims of how productive ("refreshed! rested! alert!") employees are on shorter work weeks doesn't translate to comparable results, i.e.: 80% work time doesn't produce near 100%.

My personal goal is productivity. Give me more time at home, yes, I'll be productive there ... but I can be more productive via an employer (that's why I'm employed) than growing/building what I need on a farm. Cutting work hours means less work getting done, both for my own ends and my employer's bottom line.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#72
I find WFH means I work fewer though more intense days.

I work pretty intensely M-Th. Probably easily 10 hours. Then Friday-Sunday I disconnect (Friday mornings are demos and fun mtgs). Fri-Sun I can _completly_ disconnect for a while.

So personally I want Mo-Th and 100% of my salary :)

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe he is saying that most jobs say one thing about hours and then often do another thing entirely. So in that world, taking a lower paying job for a theoretically better work life balance probably isn't going to pan out.

Yeah, I think going around telling employers that you want to get paid 80% salary to work at 80% capacity is a huge mistake. You’re giving up your negotiating position and won’t get offered good jobs. You will probably end up getting paid less than half as much as you could have if you didn’t mention to your employer that you aren’t that into working. On the other hand, you can find jobs that pay really well but have…

Yes, but the main benefit of 4 day weeks is having 3 days where you can do whatever you want. It’s not about not being “into” working. Of course, the employer will want you for as many days as possible, since even if you’re sitting there doing nothing 80% of the day on Friday, why not have you obliged in case something comes up.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#74
We should be anchoring 4-day workweek at 90% (or more), rather than 80%, when talking to employers.

If you claim that people are more productive and diminishing returns kick in at the 4-day mark, then that by definition means that the first 80% of time spent on work is responsible for more than 80% of output.

A good point in favor of doing this is multiple EU countries already operating on a 35-hour work week and paying 100% of the salary. This is equivalent to 91.42% at 32 hours.

That's the number we should be trying to aim for.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#75
Definitely would. I have done so in the past. Had to move on from that job, sadly, and I'm back to 5 day weeks. The key is the company needs a good way to handle overtime/extratime during emergencies and crunches. For example, if I were to work 40+ hours in an emergency week, I should get an extra day off the next week (or after the crisis).

Some feedback for your site: Require salary range to be listed.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#76
I would continue working 5 days a week for 100% and I’m also thinking in start making some freelancer work in my spare time.

My reasons are:

1- I struggle to self motivate and do something productive, if I have more time I would, at best, play video, at worse I would waste time arguing about politics in Reddit.

2- I’m a software engineer and I normally finish all my daily tasks in 4 hours ish. The rest of the day, while I’m waiting for more task, I’m available if anyone needs my help, but most of the time I’m doing nothing. And now that I’m working from home, this 'nothing' results in personal things. So 4 days week would only lead to do the same work done but in 4 days instead of 5 and get pay less.

3- I’m single and in my late 20s. I want to work more now so when I start a family I can work less.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They will be strictly worse than a single engineer on 100% salary Citation needed. I don't think this is an obvious conclusion. There is certainly some threshold where it becomes less efficient (40 engineers, 1hr/week each??), but I'm not sure 20hr/week is a clear threshold.

Basic economics. Some examples is equipment, mentoring and knowledge transfer. Two engineers have to do that individually, they have separate equipment sometimes in the realm of thousands of dollars. You might spend tens of thousands on employee time getting people ramped up. You also have to factor in that more people means more communication channels. Smaller teams are going to be more efficient because they can al…

Just playing devil's advocate:

* People don't work effectively for 40 hours every week 100% of the time. Perhaps 2 people working 20 hours allows greater utilization of the time with less waste because each person is fresh for greater parts of the work week. (We'd need multiple well designed studies and attempts to find the right amount of time).

* All the onboarding and upfront costs you mentioned are legitimate, but small in the grand scheme of things. Once onboarded, hopefully they are creating value. Two people onboarding together could also take some of the load off a mentor as they could help each other.

* Not all engineers are equivalent. Some might have a ton of database experience, another could be more ops oriented, and a third might have great algorithmic thinking. All can be good engineers for the role. But if you had 2 or all 3 then maybe the increased diversity of experience and skills can make the work progress faster with a higher quality.

* More people meaning more communication channels is a real concern. It's also something you have to deal with at some point. Management in general is about finding ways to work efficiently, and just like any other scenario you'd take this one into account when deciding how to work. Figure out smaller specializations, or chunk work in ways that compliment the team, or structure documentation/ideas/communication in a way that can be picked up by others.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's very straightforward. 1. I work for a company and I want to get paid more, not less. 2. OP is contacting companies and asking them to move to a model in which they pay less. (Even if the rate is the same, the absolute amount is less) 3. From the previous two points it follows that I don't agree with what OP is doing.

Someone who would like to take a pay cut for a 3-day weekend every week would disagree. Doesn't make OP's actions wrong—just different perspectives, I guess. (What if someone convinced your company to give you a raise and require you to work Saturdays?)

> What if someone convinced your company to give you a raise and require you to work Saturdays?

I would personally take a raise + extra work. But I would never presume that I have things figured out to the point where I make a website and starting contacting companies so I can push my personal preferences as the clearly superior model for people I've never met in my life. Which is what OP is doing. That's what doesn't sit right with me.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#79
I think it's very common in Europe to adapt your working hours to your situation in life. Many of my European friends decrease their hours for a small pay cut since they have children now or have to take care of elderly. Just call HR and discuss the deal. Done.

I recently worked for a Belgium startup in the NY office. Many of my coworkers in the old world had an agreement to work less for less pay. When I asked my HR in US to reduce hours for less pay due to Covid-19 the answer was exactly like OP listed: "we have always done it this way... it's not possible in US ... if you decrease your hours by one hour you will count as half-time employee and lose all benefits".

In an instant I would give up 20% pay for an extra day off. Covid-19 is far from over and lots of parents are still juggling all sorts of issues.

Re: Ask HN: Would you rather work 4 days per week for 80% salary?

#80
In a heartbeat. Like others, I could probably afford to do 60% for three days. The reality is that I'm a startup junky and it's unlikely to work. I tend to work in fast environments with rather grueling work loads, which usually comes with a disregard for personal time. At the later stages, things cool off and I take advantage of my front loading of work to relax a bit. Then I find another one.

It's a terrible cycle and if I ever have an "F you" valued exit, I'll stop for good. Or maybe work three days a week.

Post reply on HN