At this point, who can blame him.
Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
plus.google.com
Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
1–10 of 25 posts
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#2By the way, what's with the fugly Google+ URL's? Don't you agree they should make the URL's a lot nicer? There is no vanity URL either, which I'm sure quite a lot of people would like. Google has never seemed to get this. You should look at Google Sites url's. It's like 5 words in there before you even see your site's name. I wish they made them a bit more elegant and streamlined.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#3It would hardly be surprising if he had joined to see if there was anything to worry about, would it?
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#4By the way, what's with the fugly Google+ URL's? Don't you agree they should make the URL's a lot nicer? There is no vanity URL either, which I'm sure quite a lot of people would like. Google has never seemed to get this. You should look at Google Sites url's. It's like 5 words in there before you even see your site's name. I wish they made them a bit more elegant and streamlined.
agreed, totally and utterly. human readable urls are such a "tend" accepted wisdom, that i find it hard to believe it wouldn't be implemented
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#5At the risk of stating the obvious, I don't think its really him, but a nice bit of PR either way - subtle.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#6At first, I was skeptical. But if you look at the people that he has in his circles, it starts to look more and more legit (Blake Ross from Mozilla, Pedram Keyani from Facebook, Sam Lessin from Drop.io, now owned by FB, etc.)
In this case, I'm gonna go with "yes, this is actually him".
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#7At the risk of stating the obvious, I don't think its really him, but a nice bit of PR either way - subtle.
Even if he joined, he would likely use a different name.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#8By the way, what's with the fugly Google+ URL's? Don't you agree they should make the URL's a lot nicer? There is no vanity URL either, which I'm sure quite a lot of people would like. Google has never seemed to get this. You should look at Google Sites url's. It's like 5 words in there before you even see your site's name. I wish they made them a bit more elegant and streamlined.
Interestingly, the old Google Profiles did do this, my URL was https://profiles.google.com/corin.c.cole
I would imagine it will come to plus some time in the near future.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#9Wouldn't you do the same thing?
Re: Mark Zuckerberg's profile on Google+
#10There's a pretty big difference between "joined" and "switched". This title is ridiculous.