Live data from Hacker News

Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

m.dw.com

161–170 of 276 posts

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#161
post #16
post #2

I see this as market manipulation. Tesla hasn't suddenly become aware of information not available when Tesla initially announced they'd accept bitcoin as payment.

How would he benefit? There are no put-options in Bitcoin land.

Of course there are: https://www.deribit.com/main#/options?tab=BTC-28MAY21

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#162
post #60
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, they might saw the backslash in environmentalist community, that used to be their main supporters. That's imo a pretty big sudden information.

...they might have seen... - Enggrish

*English

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#163
post #116

He is also suggests they are look at Proof of Stake cryptocurrencies with significantly lower energy use. Maybe this is just a pre-cursor to Musk launching a PoS 'Tesla EnviroCoin' down the line...

I suggest E-coin. I cannot imagine the hype for such a coin.

Brilliant, with the slightly rotated E logo (from Enron and Evil Corp) on the coin!

Fits a pathological liar like Elon

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#164

So far, Elon/Tesla: 1. Bought a bunch of Bitcoin. 2. Announced they were going to accept Bitcoin, sending the price up. 3. Sold a bunch of Bitcoin to pad out otherwise poor earnings, citing their goal of "testing liquidity of the market." 4. Announced they were going to stop accepting Bitcoin, sending the price plummeting. As though he didn't know the environmental impact a week ago? As though he didn't check for liq…

When Tesla announced the initial move they received a huge amount of push back for the environmental concerns. And it didn’t look good for an EV company of all things. There is a trend I’ve seen of a company making a decison, everyone hating on them for it, then they reverse the decision, and they are still criticised. If a company turns around and reverses a decision citing the very reasons they were criticised for…

I’m fairly sure a company has the resources to ask a few people from the target audience before making a decision. And frankly, it was so obvious that it’s a bad decision, bitcoin is just hyped by a similar group that thinks of Elon highly for some strange reason, and for him, fame is everything.

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#166
post #25

The same argument people made against Tesla saying why electric cars weren't really better than combustion engine cars. They said Tesla cars use a lot of energy, much of which comes from coal and other dirty sources. What a joke that Elon is making this argument.

Tesla cars don't use an absurd amount of energy given the problem they're solving. Bitcoin does.

This is only true if you don't think Bitcoin is solving an important problem. For me, I think it is solving arguably the most important problem. That being said, even if I think clothes dryers (which use more energy than bitcoin) aren't solving a very important problem, I don't try and tell people they are bad or immoral or destroying the environment because they use clothes dryers.

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#167
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Except they still own a ton of Bitcoin No where in my sentence suggested they sold all of it. > so I don’t see how selling a tiny bit of it could be described as “to perfection” Telsa did not lose any money from their BTC investment and are still up >40%. At that time, they (and others on Twitter) caused a run up in the crypto markets to drive the BTC price up to new all time highs and got out a large profit even b…

Why is it clever to tank an asset that they own? How did the 12% drop benefit Tesla? You're not making any sense.

edit: nevermind

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#168
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a big difference. Even if people using EVs now effectively burn coal to do it, they replaced an ICE and can migrate to greener sources over time. On the other hand, crypto mining exists purely on top of existing energy usage. These are not really comparable situations.

Sorry, I am not sure I completely understand your argument. You expect the energy used for Tesla cars to more easily migrate to greener energy? Bitcoin mining is completely location independent and is able to migrate to cheaper (which as renewable energy tech improves will equal greener) energy much easier than an individual tesla owner can.

More easily than your new combustion engine car, I think was the argument.

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#169

So far, Elon/Tesla: 1. Bought a bunch of Bitcoin. 2. Announced they were going to accept Bitcoin, sending the price up. 3. Sold a bunch of Bitcoin to pad out otherwise poor earnings, citing their goal of "testing liquidity of the market." 4. Announced they were going to stop accepting Bitcoin, sending the price plummeting. As though he didn't know the environmental impact a week ago? As though he didn't check for liq…

Classic pump & dump.

And of course, there's no one to complain as crypto markets are unregulated anyway

Re: Tesla no longer accepts Bitcoin due to climate impact

#170

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Meanwhile they started accepting Dogecoin at SpaceX just couple of days ago . Dogecoin has exactly the same energy spending incentives as Bitcoin. The whole set of actions doesn't sound very logical.

> Dogecoin has exactly the same energy spending incentives as Bitcoin. Does it? I thought that Bitcoin was particularly bad because block sizes were small, so there's a big incentive to mine and get mining fees. Dogecoin is still wasteful, but it's an order of magnitude less than Bitcoin.

> I thought that Bitcoin was particularly bad because block sizes were small, so there's a big incentive to mine and get mining fees.

No. Doesn't make sense.

Miners get rewarded for spending energy in all PoW coins. I don't think details such as block size matters. Dogecoin BTW as well has the 1MB block limit, their block time is just smaller (1 minute). However dogecoin has quite small amount of transactions compared to BTC, it is nowhere near its capacity limits yet.

Post reply on HN