Live data from Hacker News

Poll: What do you think of Google+?

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 156 posts

Re: Poll: What do you think of Google+?

#51
Google+ has the same buzz and expectation which was associated with gmail when it was first launched (with respect to scarcity of invites). I am based in India (not sure how location matters) and I remember I had to wait a few weeks for someone to invite me to gmail.

If that is some indication, then Google+ looks to be a winner. (I remember how I moved from Yahoo! and Hotmail email to gmail after I finally got the invite).

Re: Poll: What do you think of Google+?

#52
post #8

With all the hype surrounding google+ it's a crying shame it's not openly available. Within a couple of days my interest will have subsided and it will be nothing but a distant memory .. which I can imagine will be the case for a lot of people. Hopefully if it is any good, it will claw it's way back into the media spotlight, but how many people will try for a second time to sign up. IMHO the invite only plan will kil…

Making it invite-only forces people to talk about it. Gmail's slow launch was done really well, and probably drove interest more than harmed it. If Google handles this well, the same thing could happen for Google+.

You didn't need other people to join gmail.

Re: Poll: What do you think of Google+?

#53
Small plug: you can see a graph of the results here: http://hackernewspoll.appspot.com/2712967

I did this small service using GAE after seeing so many people manually updating graphs, it's painful. Btw, every poll works, just change the number with the poll id from YCombinator's URL.

Re: Poll: What do you think of Google+?

#58
It'd be much more useful if they'd integrated it with Apps accounts prior to launch.

Apps customers still can't create Profiles, never got to use Buzz etc etc, despite being promised Profiles 'in a few weeks' back in March.

Re: Poll: What do you think of Google+?

#60
post #31
post #18

I do not have a Google+-shaped hole in my life right now. If a) it starts to matter to non-technical Internet users and b) they tie it into search heavily (which is the Google go-to playbook for promoting properties of strategic importance), I will start caring with alacrity.

Just watch as your friends and family drag you through the don't-need-it wall carving a Google+ shaped hole. Google+ will succeed because it's an exact clone of Facebook, but faster, more open to search engines (shocking!), integrated right into Gmail and makes it easier than Facebook to spam people. The feature which Google is claiming to be the revolutionary new thing (Circles) has already existed in Facebook for a…

Facebook lists are pretty much useless. Yes, you can hide all your status updates from a selected bunch of people, but if you want to show them a single one you've got to make a bunch of additional clicks and then type in the lists' name (if you can recall it). It seems as if the feature was on purpose crippled so no one would bother to use it. Simplifying the whole process should be quite easy - and that's what Google did (I guess).
Post reply on HN