Also do you have planned custom domains?
Great job!
21–30 of 152 posts
Also do you have planned custom domains?
Great job!
Personally I much prefer websites that don't use up that much bandwidth.
Let's take https://asset.mmm.page/77/a05aa5533e4f3a97080c63f9b70189/04-.... 4,748,611 bytes, 2602x4336 pixels, actually rendered at a ~150x250px size. Do you really need to ship that many pixels?
I hope more people pay attention to reducing bloat than looking campy, kitschy, messy, imperfect.
I wish the "edit" button was more visible. I noticed it only on my second visit. After I found it, I enjoyed playing with the page and the first hand experience a lot more than reading about it. During my first visit I wasn't impressed but now the product looks cool to me.
> Websites shouldn't all look the same. We prefer campy, kitschy, messy, imperfect. I really like the design aesthethic this product encourages. There's so much charm and fun and eccentricity that's lost in a web where full-height responsive image backgrounds and blocky design frameworks are ubiquitous. If this can help people express just a little bit of the wild creativity of things like early 2000's MySpace layout…
I would like to add "breakpoints" and make adjustments just for the screen size I'm currently viewing it in.